S'abonner

Anesthesiologists' perceptions of minimum acceptable work habits of nurse anesthetists - 18/04/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.01.031 
Ilana I. Logvinov, RN, MSN, CCRP a , Franklin Dexter, MD, PhD b, , Bradley J. Hindman, MD c , Sorin J. Brull a
a Mayo Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, 14390 Mayo Boulevard, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA 
b University of Iowa, Department of Anesthesia, Division of Management Consulting, 200 Hawkins Drive, 6-JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA 
c University of Iowa, Department of Anesthesia, 200 Hawkins Drive, 6-JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Study objective

Work habits are non-technical skills that are an important part of job performance. Although non-technical skills are usually evaluated on a relative basis (i.e., “grading on a curve”), validity of evaluation on an absolute basis (i.e., “minimum passing score”) needs to be determined.

Design

Survey and observational study.

Patients

None.

Interventions

None.

Measurements

The theme of “work habits” was assessed using a modification of Dannefer et al.'s 6-item scale, with scores ranging from 1 (lowest performance) to 5 (highest performance). E-mail invitations were sent to all consultant and fellow anesthesiologists at Mayo Clinic in Florida, Arizona, and Minnesota. Because work habits expectations can be generational, the survey was designed for adjustment based on all invited (responding or non-responding) anesthesiologists' year of graduation from residency.

Main results

The overall mean±standard deviation of the score for anesthesiologists' minimum expectations of nurse anesthetists' work habits was 3.64±0.66 (N=48). Minimum acceptable scores were correlated with the year of graduation from anesthesia residency (linear regression P=0.004). Adjusting for survey non-response using all N=207 anesthesiologists, the mean of the minimum acceptable work habits adjusted for year of graduation was 3.69 (standard error 0.02).

The minimum expectations for nurse anesthetists' work habits were compared with observational data obtained from the University of Iowa. Among 8940 individual nurse anesthetist work habits scores, only 2.6% were <3.69. All N=65 of the Iowa nurse anesthetists' mean work habits scores were significantly greater than the Mayo estimate (3.69) for the minimum expectations; all P<0.00024.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that routinely evaluated work habits of nurse anesthetists within departments should not be compared with an appropriate minimum score (i.e., of 3.69). Instead, work habits scores should be analyzed based on relative reporting among anesthetists.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Highlights

Work habits are non-technical skills that are an important part of job performance. Nurse anesthetists’ work habits can be assessed daily.
Nurse anesthetists’ work habits can be assessed daily on a 1 (lowest performance) to 5 (highest performance) scale.
By survey, the mean minimum acceptable work habits was 3.69, SE=0.02.
In practice, all nurse anesthetists’ mean work habits scores are significantly greater than these minimum expectations.
As for most non-technical skills, employed non-trainees can be compared on a relative (ranked) basis.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Performance evaluation, Nurse anesthetists, Work habits


Plan


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 38

P. 107-110 - mai 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Effectiveness of active and passive warming for the prevention of inadvertent hypothermia in patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  • Clarissa A. Shaw, Victoria M. Steelman, Jennifer DeBerg, Marin L. Schweizer
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The suppressive effects of landiolol administration on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and tachycardia, and plasma IL-6 elevation in patients undergoing esophageal surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial
  • Yuta Horikoshi, Toru Goyagi, Ryohei Kudo, Sahoko Kodama, Takashi Horiguchi, Toshiaki Nishikawa

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.