S'abonner

Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial: effect of aspirin in prevention of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups of women according to their characteristics and medical and obstetrical history - 17/09/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.038 
Liona C. Poon, MD a, e, David Wright, PhD f, Daniel L. Rolnik, MD a, Argyro Syngelaki, PhD a, Juan Luis Delgado, MD g, Theodora Tsokaki, MD a, b, Gergo Leipold, MD a, c, Ranjit Akolekar, MD a, h, Siobhan Shearing, RM i, Luciana De Stefani, MD a, d, Jacques C. Jani, MD j, Walter Plasencia, MD k, Nikolaos Evangelinakis, MD l, Otilia Gonzalez-Vanegas, MD m, Nicola Persico, MD n, Kypros H. Nicolaides, MD a,
a King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom 
b North Middlesex University Hospital, London, United Kingdom 
c Lewisham University Hospital, London, United Kingdom 
d Homerton University Hospital, London, United Kingdom 
e Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 
f University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom 
g Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain 
h Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, United Kingdom 
i Southend University Hospital, Essex, United Kingdom 
j University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium 
k Hospiten Group, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain 
l Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece 
m Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain 
n Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy 

Corresponding author: Kypros H. Nicolaides, MD.
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Sunday 17 September 2017
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder

Abstract

Background

The Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial demonstrated that in women who were at high risk for preterm preeclampsia with delivery at <37 weeks’ gestation identified by screening by means of an algorithm that combines maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks’ gestation, aspirin administration from 11 to 14 until 36 weeks’ gestation was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of preterm preeclampsia (odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.74; P=0.004).

Objective

We sought to examine whether there are differences in the effect of aspirin on the incidence of preterm preeclampsia in the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and medical and obstetrical history.

Study Design

This was a secondary analysis of data from the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess evidence of differences in the effect of aspirin on incidence of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups defined by maternal age (<30 and ≥30 years), body mass index (<25 and ≥25 kg/m2), racial origin (Afro-Caribbean, Caucasian and other), method of conception (natural and assisted), cigarette smoking (smoker and non-smoker), family history of preterm preeclampsia (present and absent), obstetrical history (nulliparous, multiparous with previous preterm preeclampsia and multiparous without previous preterm preeclampsia), history of chronic hypertension (present and absent). Interaction tests were performed on the full data set of patients in the intention to treat population and on the data set of patients who took ≥ 90% of the prescribed medication. Results are presented as forest plot with P values for the interaction effects, group sizes, event counts and estimated odds ratios. We examined whether the test of interaction was significant at the 5% level with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.

Results

There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the aspirin effect in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and obstetrical history. In participants with chronic hypertension preterm preeclampsia occurred in 10.2% (5/49) in the aspirin group and 8.2% (5/61) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–5.12). The respective values in those without chronic hypertension were 1.1% (8/749) in the aspirin group and 3.9% (30/761) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.60). In all participants with adherence of ≥90% the adjusted odds ratio in the aspirin group was 0.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.09–0.65); in the subgroup with chronic hypertension it was 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.40–10.71); and in those without chronic hypertension it was 0.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.01–0.41). For the complete data set the test of interaction was not significant at the 5% level (P = .055), but in those with adherence ≥90%, after adjustment for multiple comparisons, the interaction was significant at the 5% level (P = .0019).

Conclusion

The beneficial effect of aspirin in the prevention of preterm preeclampsia may not apply in pregnancies with chronic hypertension. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the aspirin effect in subgroups defined according to maternal characteristics and obstetrical history.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : aspirin, ASPRE trial, chronic hypertension, first-trimester screening, mean arterial blood pressure, placental growth factor, preeclampsia, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, uterine artery Doppler


Plan


 The study was supported by grants from the Fetal Medicine Foundation (charity no. 1037116) and by the European Union 7th Framework Program FP7-HEALTH-2013-INNOVATION-2 (ASPRE project no. 601852). These bodies had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 Cite this article as: Poon LC, Wright D, Rolnik DL, et al. Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial: effect of aspirin in prevention of preterm preeclampsia in subgroups of women according to their characteristics and medical and obstetrical history. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;volume:x.ex-x.ex.


© 2017  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.