Guillain–Barré syndrome subtypes: A clinical electrophysiological study of 100 patients - 14/11/18
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Abstract |
Introduction |
A retrospective analysis was performed to document the clinical and electrophysiological features of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) subtypes using different diagnostic criteria.
Methods |
One hundred GBS patients were included. Clinical and laboratory features were analyzed, and patients were classified according to four sets of diagnostic criteria. Electrodiagnostic criteria were also analyzed.
Results |
A total of 69 patients met Asbury and Cornblath's criteria, 96 met Van der Meché’s criteria, 99 met Wakerley's diagnostic classification and 86 met level 1 or 2 of the Brighton criteria. Rates of GBS subtypes were: 69% classic GBS; 8% Miller–Fisher syndrome; 12% paraparetic GBS; 2% pharyngeal–cervical–brachial GBS; and 9% unclassified. Those for electrodiagnostic subtypes were 52% demyelinating and 9% axonal according to Hadden's criteria vs 41% demyelinating and 41% axonal as per Rajabally's criteria.
Conclusion |
In this study of case distribution within the GBS spectrum of a retrospective cohort of French patients, the application of new diagnostic criteria enabled accurate diagnoses and classifications of the different subtypes, and also increased the recognition of axonal GBS.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Guillain-Barré syndrome, Diagnostic criteria, Electrodiagnostic criteria, GBS subtypes, Miller-Fisher syndrome, Paraparetic GBS
Abbreviations : AMAN, BBE, CSF, GBS, MFS, NCS, PCB, P-GBS
Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?