S'abonner

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-grade endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of performance characteristics - 01/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.034 
Zibi Marchocki, MD a, Maria C. Cusimano, MD b, Lauren Clarfield, BSc c, Soyoun Rachel Kim, MD a, Rouhi Fazelzad, MISt d, Osvaldo Espin-Garcia, PhD e, Geneviève Bouchard-Fortier, MD a, Emma C. Rossi, MD f, Katherine I. Stewart, MD g, Pamela T. Soliman, MD h, Jeffrey A. How, MD h, Walter H. Gotlieb, MD i, Robert W. Holloway, MD j, Manuel M. Ianieri, MD, PhD k, Silvia Cabrera, MD l, Yong Kuei Lim, MD m, Sarah E. Ferguson, MD a,
a Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
c Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
d Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network Library and Information Services, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
e Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
f Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 
g Division of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 
h Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 
i Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
j Gynecologic Oncology Program, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL 
k Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy 
l Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain 
m Department of Gynecologic Oncology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore 

Corresponding author: Sarah E. Ferguson, MD.

Abstract

Objective

A sentinel lymph node biopsy is widely accepted as the standard of care for surgical staging in low-grade endometrial cancer, but its value in high-grade endometrial cancer remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the performance characteristics of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with endometrial cancer with high-grade histology (registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with identifying number CRD42020160280).

Data Sources

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Embase databases all through the OvidSP platform. The search was performed between January 1, 2000, and January 26, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing registered clinical trials.

Study Eligibility Criteria

We included prospective cohort studies in which sentinel lymph node biopsy were evaluated in clinical stage I patients with high-grade endometrial cancer (grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, mixed, undifferentiated or dedifferentiated, and high-grade not otherwise specified) with a cervical injection of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node detection and at least a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as a reference standard. If the data were not reported specifically for patients with high-grade histology, the authors were contacted for aggregate data.

Methods

We pooled the detection rates and measures of diagnostic accuracy using a generalized linear mixed-effects model with a logit and assessed the risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

Results

We identified 16 eligible studies of which the authors for 9 of the studies provided data on 429 patients with high-grade endometrial cancer specifically. The study-level median age was 66 years (range, 44–82.5 years) and the study-level median body mass index was 28.6 kg/m2 (range, 19.4–43.7 kg/m2). The pooled detection rates were 91% per patient (95% confidence interval, 85%–95%; I2=59%) and 64% bilaterally (95% confidence interval, 53%–73%; I2=69%). The overall node positivity rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 19%–34%; I2=44%). Of the 87 patients with positive node results, a sentinel lymph node biopsy correctly identified 80, yielding a pooled sensitivity of 92% per patient (95% confidence interval, 84%–96%; I2=0%), a false negative rate of 8% (95% confidence interval, 4%–16%; I2=0%), and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% confidence interval, 95%–99%; I2=0%).

Conclusion

Sentinel lymph node biopsy accurately detect lymph node metastases in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer with a false negative rate comparable with that observed in low-grade endometrial cancer, melanoma, vulvar cancer, and breast cancer. These findings suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy can replace complete lymphadenectomies as the standard of care for surgical staging in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : endometrial cancer, high-grade, indocyanine green, sentinel lymph node


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 This study received no financial support.


© 2021  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 225 - N° 4

P. 367.e1-367.e39 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Umbilical cord prolapse: revisiting its definition and management
  • Lo Wong, Angel Hoi Wan Kwan, So Ling Lau, Wing To Angela Sin, Tak Yeung Leung
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Preincision adjunctive prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Metabel T. Markwei, Ifeoluwa Babatunde, Nityam Rathi, Cong Fan, Marie-Ann Prah, Julia Joo, Loren Hackett, David E. Soper, Oluwatosin Goje

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.