S'abonner

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization: the PASTIME protocol - 01/10/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.001 
Dora J. Melber, MD a, , Zachary T. Berman, MD b, Marni B. Jacobs, PhD, MPH a, Andrew C. Picel, MD c, Charlotte L. Conturie, MD d, Kathy Zhang-Rutledge, MD a, Pratibha S. Binder, MD e, Ramez N. Eskander, MD e, Anne C. Roberts, MD b, Michael T. McHale, MD e, Gladys A. Ramos, MD a, Jerasimos Ballas, MD, MPH a, Thomas F. Kelly, MD a
a Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 
b Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 
c Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 
d Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Obstetrics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 
e Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 

Corresponding author: Dora J. Melber, MD.

Abstract

Background

Multidisciplinary care of placenta accreta spectrum cases improves pregnancy outcomes, but the specific components of such a multidisciplinary collaboration varies between institutions. As experience with placenta accreta spectrum increases, it is crucial to assess new surgical techniques and protocols to help improve maternal outcomes and to advocate for hospital resources.

Objective

This study aimed to assess a novel multidisciplinary protocol for the treatment of placenta accreta spectrum that comprises cesarean delivery, multivessel uterine embolization, and hysterectomy in a single procedure within a hybrid operative suite.

Study Design

This was a matched prepost study of placenta accreta spectrum cases managed before (2010–2017) and after implementation of the Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization protocol (2018–2021) at a tertiary medical center. Historical cases were managed with internal iliac artery balloon placement in selected cases with the decision to inflate the balloons intraoperatively at the discretion of the primary surgeon. Intraoperative Embolization cases were compared with historical cases in a 1:2 ratio matched on the basis of placenta accreta spectrum severity and surgical urgency. The primary outcome was a requirement for transfusion with packed red blood cells. Secondary outcomes included estimated surgical blood loss, operative and postoperative complications, procedural time, length of stay, and neonatal outcomes.

Results

A total of 15 Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization cases and 30 matched historical cases were included in the analysis. There were no demographic differences noted between the groups. A median (interquartile range) of 0 units (0–2 units) of packed red blood cells were transfused in the Intraoperative Embolization group compared with 2 units (0–4.5 units) in the historical group (P=.045); 5 of 15 (33.3%) Intraoperative Embolization cases required blood transfusions compared with 19 of 30 (63.3%) cases in the historical group (P=.11). The estimated blood loss was significantly less in the Intraoperative Embolization group with a median (interquartile range) of 750 mL (450–1050 mL) compared with 1750 mL (1050–2500 mL) in the historical group (P=.003). There were no cases requiring massive transfusion (≥10 red blood cell units in 24 hours) in the Intraoperative Embolization group compared with 5 of 30 (16.7%) cases in the historical group (P=.15). There were no intraoperative deaths from hemorrhagic shock using the Intraoperative Embolization protocol, whereas this occurred in 2 of the historical cases. The mean duration of the interventional radiology procedure was longer in the Intraoperative Embolization group (67.8 vs 34.1 minutes; P=.002). Intensive care unit admission and postpartum length of stay were similar, and surgical and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups. The gestational age and neonatal birthweights were similar; however, the neonatal length of stay was longer in the Intraoperative Embolization group (median duration, 32 days vs 15 days; P=.02) with a trend toward low Apgar scores. Incidence of arterial umbilical cord blood pH <7.2 and respiratory distress syndrome and intubation rates were not statistically different between the groups.

Conclusion

A multidisciplinary pathway including a single-surgery protocol with multivessel uterine embolization is associated with a decrease in blood transfusion requirements and estimated blood loss with no increase in operative complications. The Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization protocol provides a definitive surgical method that warrants consideration by other centers specializing in placenta accreta spectrum treatment.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : arterial embolization, blood loss, blood transfusion, cesarean hysterectomy, interventional radiology, placenta accreta spectrum, postpartum hemorrhage, pregnancy


Plan


 The authors report no conflict of interest.
 The authors report no funding sources.
 D.J.B. ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6197-6619.
 Cite this article as: Melber DJ, Berman ZT, Jacobs MB, et al. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization: the PASTIME protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:442.e1-10.


© 2021  The Authors. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 225 - N° 4

P. 442.e1-442.e10 - octobre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Amniotic fluid microRNA profiles in twin-twin transfusion syndrome with and without severe recipient cardiomyopathy
  • Emily C. Willner, Henry L. Galan, Bettina F. Cuneo, Hilary A. Hoffman, Bonnie Neltner, Eleanor L. Schuchardt, Anis Karimpour-Fard, Shelley D. Miyamoto, Carmen C. Sucharov
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior and transverse positions to decrease operative delivery: the PROPOP randomized clinical trial
  • Julie Blanc, Pierre Castel, Franck Mauviel, Karine Baumstarck, Florence Bretelle, Claude D’Ercole, Jean-Baptiste Haumonte

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.