S'abonner

Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery - 19/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.079 
John Yeh, MD a, , Jean Wactawski-Wende, PhD a, b, James A. Shelton, MS a, Jennifer Reschke, MS b
a Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences 
b Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 

Reprint requests: John Yeh, MD, Department of Gynecology-Obstetrics, University at Buffalo, 219 Bryant St, Buffalo, NY 14222.

Abstract

Objective

The national rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery decreased by 55% between 1996 and 2002. The objective of this investigation was to determine, in our population in upstate New York, whether this decline in the vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate was due to temporal changes in the trial of labor rates or in the vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates.

Study design

Regional perinatal databases were used to obtain birth certificate data from a total of 135,833 live births in upstate New York from 1998 to 2002. Trial of labor, vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates were calculated for the 11,446 women who had had a previous cesarean delivery and a singleton, low-risk pregnancy at ≥37 weeks of gestation. Additional factors that were analyzed included age, race, education, insurance, body mass index, parity, gestation, area of residence, prenatal care provider, size of hospital, and level of newborn nursery specialization. Tests for trends were conducted by year for each of the variables.

Results

The trial of labor rate declined 39% from 58.7 in 1998 to 35.7 per 100 eligible women in 2002 (P < .01). The decline in trial of labor rates persisted after stratification within almost all groups (P < .01). The overall vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate decreased 44%, from 42.7 in 1998 to 24.1 per 100 eligible women in 2002 (P < .01). The decline in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates persisted after stratification within almost all groups (P < .01). The rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success was unchanged from 1998 to 2002 (P = not significant).

Conclusion

We found a major decline in trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates in low-risk women from 1998 to 2002. There was no change in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in those patients who attempted trial of labor. This suggests that the decline in the vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rates that have been observed nationally may be due to a decline in trial of labor attempts and not to a change in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. The steep declines in trial of labor attempts and vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries suggest that there was a rapid change in the perception of optimal treatment practices for these patients by obstetricians.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : Trial of labor, Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery


Plan


 Supplemental material for this article can be found at www.ajog.org.


© 2006  Mosby, Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 194 - N° 1

P. 144.e1-144.e12 - janvier 2006 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Selective use of fetal fibronectin detection after cervical length measurement to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor
  • Thomas Schmitz, Françoise Maillard, Sandrine Bessard-Bacquaert, Gilles Kayem, Yvonne Fulla, Dominique Cabrol, François Goffinet
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Fetal thymic involution: A sonographic marker of the fetal inflammatory response syndrome
  • Edoardo Di Naro, Antonella Cromi, Fabio Ghezzi, Luigi Raio, Stefano Uccella, Vincenzo D’Addario, Giuseppe Loverro

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.