The Physiological Profile Assessment: Clinical validity of the postural sway measure and comparison of impairments by age

Doi : 10.1016/j.eurger.2011.11.010

M.B. Liston ^a , M. Pavlou ^a, A. Hopper ^b, M. Kinirons ^b, F.C. Martin ^b

Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le samedi 14 janvier 2012

Abstract

Background

The Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) assesses falls risk in older adults by measuring impairments most associated with multiple falls. To date, no study has investigated the change in PPA impairment profile with age.

Objective

To describe impairment profiles, by age and ability to complete the postural sway measure, of older adults fallers.

Participants

We note that 885 older adults referred to multidisciplinary falls clinics located within two inner London boroughs (UK).

Methods

Anonymised data was extracted from the PPA falls risk database. For comparisons, data was grouped by gender, age, and ability to complete the postural Sway test.

Results

There were significant differences between all age groups in PPA falls risk, edge contrast sensitivity, quadriceps strength (Quad), postural sway and reported falls within the previous year (P <0.01). The oldest age group (90+) had the highest PPA falls risk (P <0.01), yet reported significantly less falls than the youngest age group (60 to 69; P <0.05). There was significant variability in test results, with younger age groups displaying greater variability across PPA measures, and older age groups displaying more consistency (P <0.05); 15.1% (n =134) of patients that were able to perform the postural sway measure received a higher risk score for this test than those unable to complete the task.

Conclusions

Greater variability in younger age groups indicates that specific impairments may provide the cause of falls, whereas widespread global reduction in function and frailty may provide the cause for falls in the older age groups. The postural sway scoring does not reflect ability to perform the test.