Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



@@#116300@@

European Psychiatry
Sous presse. Epreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le mardi 14 juin 2011
Doi : 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.11.013
Received : 15 June 2009 ;  accepted : 3 November 2009
Research planning for the future of psychiatric diagnosis
 

D.A. Regier a, , E.A. Kuhl a, W.E. Narrow a, D.J. Kupfer b
a American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education, Division of Research, American Psychiatric Association, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209, United States 
b Western Psychiatric Clinical Institute and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 3811 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2593, United States 

Corresponding author. Tel.: +703 907 8630; fax: +703 907 1087.
Abstract

More than 10 years prior to the anticipated 2013 publication of DSM-5, processes were set in motion to assess the research and clinical issues that would best inform future diagnostic classification of mental disorders. These efforts intended to identify the clinical and research needs within various populations, examine the current state of the science to determine the empirical evidence for improving criteria within and across disorders, and stimulate research in areas that could potentially provide evidence for change. In the second phase of the revision process, the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) recently completed the 5-year international series of 13 diagnostic conferences convened by APA/APIRE in collaboration with the World Health Organization and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under a cooperative grant funded by the NIH. From these conferences, the DSM-5 Task Force and Work Groups have developed plans for potential revisions for DSM-5, including the incorporation of dimensional approaches within and across diagnostic groups to clarify heterogeneity, improve diagnostic validity, and enhance clinical case conceptualization. Use of dimensions for measurement-based care has been shown to be feasible in psychiatric and primary care settings and may inform monitoring of disorder threshold, severity, and treatment outcomes. The integration of dimensions with diagnostic categories represents an exciting and potentially transformative approach for DSM-5 to simultaneously address DSM-IV’s clinical short-comings and create novel pathways for research in neurobiology, genetics, and psychiatric epidemiology.


Keywords : DSM-5, ICD-11, Psychiatric nosology, Classification of psychiatric disorders




© 2011  Elsevier Masson SAS. All Rights Reserved.
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline