S'abonner

Is evidence-based medicine drug therapy well implemented after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in contemporary practice? A one-year follow-up study - 22/03/17

Doi : 10.1016/j.phclin.2017.01.044 
C. Bruggmann 1, 2, , J. Iglesias 3, R. Fesselet 3, P. Vogt 3, F. Sadeghipour 1, 2, P. Voirol 1, 2
1 Pharmacy service, Lausanne University hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland 
2 School of pharmaceutical sciences, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland 
3 Cardiology service, Lausanne University hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland 

Corresponding author. Avenue Victor-Ruffy, 46 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Résumé

Background and objectives

Adherence to secondary prevention evidence-based medical (EBM) therapies for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is essential to reduce long-term rates of major adverse cardiovascular events. Current guidelines recommend the long-term use of low-dose aspirin, high-intensity statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and beta-blockers (BB), in addition to P2Y12 inhibitors for one year. We aimed to assess the adherence to secondary prevention EBM therapies from discharge to one-year follow-up among patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary practice.

Methods

Observational single-center study including consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI in a tertiary hospital in Switzerland over a one-year period. Secondary prevention EBM therapies were assessed at discharge and at one-year follow-up. Primary outcome is the prescription of key secondary prevention EBM therapies (aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, statins, ACEI/ARB and BB) from discharge to one-year follow-up after STEMI. BB was recommended only for patients with heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<40%.

Results

A total of 179 patients were included. EBM drug prescription at discharge was 99.4% for aspirin (n=178), 97.8% for P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (n=175), 97.2% for statin (n=174), 93.9% for ACEI/ARB (n=168) and 87.5% for BB (n=28, among 32 patients with LVEF<40%). Ticagrelor (84.6%) was the major P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed. Overall, 25 EBM drugs were missing at discharge with 13 of these missing drugs having no justification for no-prescription (contraindications, allergy or intolerance). At one-year follow-up (median 13.4 months, n=156), aspirin, statins and ACEI/ARB prescription rates were 92.9% (n=145), 92.3% (n=144) and 82.1% (n=128) respectively. Nineteen out of 23 patients (82.6%) with LVEF<40% received a BB. Among patients treated with ticagrelor at discharge, 31 (23.5%) were receiving ticagrelor at follow-up, whereas 21 (15.9%) were switched to another P2Y12 inhibitor. Among patients who discontinued ticagrelor (n=80, 60.6%), duration of dual antiplatelet therapy was 12 months for 80% (n=64) and discontinued prematurely (<1 year) for 15% (n=12) patients. Reasons for ticagrelor early discontinuation or switch were not specified.

Discussion and conclusions

In a real-world cohort of patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, prescription of recommended secondary prevention medications at discharge is excellent. Adherence to EBM therapies at one year remains high with more than 80% of patients receiving all EBM drugs. Early discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy was observed in 15% of patients, whereas ticagrelor was switched for another P2Y12 inhibitor in 15.9% of patients. These observations highlight key opportunities to improve longitudinal use of secondary prevention therapies after STEMI in routine clinical practice.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2017  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 52 - N° 1

P. e16-e17 - mars 2017 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Translation and validation of the CLEO tool to assess the potential relevance of pharmacists’ interventions
  • D. Stämpfli, P. Baumgartner, F. Boeni, P. Bedouch, M.-L. Lampert
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Le livret thérapeutique de notre hôpital permet-il de répondre aux besoins des services de pédiatrie ?
  • A. Faucitano, A. Rougny, M. Medjoub, A. Clairet, S. Limat

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.