Médecine

Paramédical

Autres domaines


S'abonner

Trace and Memory of Trauma: From Bodily Memory to Symbolic Memory - 08/09/19

Doi : 10.1016/j.evopsy.2019.05.002 
Gabriela Patiño-Lakatos, PhD Education 1,  : Clinical psychologist; Associate member of CRPMS, Université de Paris 7–Diderot; Associate member of CIRCEFT, Université de Paris 8. Associate researcher at LAM, Institut Jean Le Rond d’Alembert, Sorbonne Université–CNRS. Former researcher in residence at the Institut d’Etudes Avancées, Nantes (2015–2016)
 Institut Jean-le-Rond-d’Alembert, Sorbonne université, Tour 45-54, 4, place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France 

Corresponding author.

Abstract

Objective

This article presents a reflection at the convergence of psychoanalysis, philosophy, and art on the relationships between the construction of memory and different forms of traces of traumatic events. The interactions of psychic and physical, material and symbolic traces of trauma are analyzed to understand their vicissitudes and possible elaborations at the intersection of the individual and the collective.

Method

Starting from an analysis of the psychic processes mobilized by trauma, the conditions of the possibility and the stakes of the work of memory for subjective and social life are examined. The concepts of trace, memory, forgetting, repetition, and remembrance are articulated, through a study of a documentary film by J. Oppenheimer on the Indonesian massacres of 1965 and of texts by J. Améry and I. Kertész that refer to the Shoah.

Results

The traumatized subject suffers in her/his body from the incessant return of physical and psychic, fragmentary and haunting traces, which cannot be considered a veritable remembrance. Memory is a diachronic process that selects, arranges, and transforms traces into a subjectivated remembrance on which the subject can rely to survive trauma. The work of memory as it operates in writing is a particular form of elaboration of the trace: it enacts the possibility of the passage from a somatic inscription of the traumatic event, which destabilizes the psyche, in the flesh of the body to a symbolic and exosomatic inscription of it. This writing allows for a rewriting of an experience at the limits of the humanly possible, of that which, having marked the body, imposes the difficulty, if not the impossibility, of telling and representing that lived experience as history.

Discussion

The elaboration of memory cannot be considered a strictly individual process. In this ordeal of the elaboration of remembrance, the subject of the trauma cannot be left behind by the other. The work of memory thus always implies a discursive construction of remembrance that calls for examination. In this sense, the archaeologist, the historian, and the therapist can provide the conditions to make this construction possible, or to question it. Nevertheless, most of the memory work consists, from the point of view of the therapist, in the successive positions adopted by the subject at each new remembering.

Conclusion

In writing, the work of remembrance engages the subject, in her/his body of drives, in a construction of the trace through which s/he can preserve her/his integrity in the face of the catastrophe. In this way s/he can remember not to “forget,” but to relieve her/himself of having to bear the traces of the traumatic unrepresentable alone.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Memory, Trauma, Body, Symbolic, Writing


Plan


 Any reference to this article must mention: Patiño-Lakatos G. Trace and Memory of Trauma: From Bodily Memory to Symbolic Memory. Evol psychiatr 2019; 84(3): pages (for the print version) or URL [date of visit] (for the online version).


© 2019  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 84 - N° 3

P. e45-e58 - septembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Trace et mémoire du trauma : de la mémoire du corps à la mémoire symbolique
  • Gabriela Patiño-Lakatos
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Profil d’admission des patients hospitalisés à l’Unité pour Malades Difficiles Henri Colin en 2016
  • Marion Guillot, Marion Azoulay, Sophie Raymond, Bernard Lachaux

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement ou un achat à l’unité.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

;

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.