Variation of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion in progressive severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis - 05/12/19
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.
Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!
Abstract |
Introduction |
The aim of this study is to investigate the variation of the glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion in progressive severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis using a 3-D-motion analysis. Moreover, the variation of the Constant Score is evaluated.
Hypothesis |
The hypothesis is that the motion of the scapulothoracic joint may partly compensate for the loss of the glenohumeral joint movement in patients with increasing severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Material and methods |
A total of 21 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint were clinically examined, divided in three groups (SP1-SP3) according to size of their caudal osteophyte. The contribution of the scapulothoracic (acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular) joint to the total arm (humerothoracical) elevation in sagittal and frontal plane was measured with 3D motion analysis and the Constant Score was evaluated.
Discussion |
In sagittal plane elevation (anteversion) the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint to the total elevation was while arm raising 32.7% (SD 8.0%) in Group SP1, 36.6% (SD 11.0%) in Group SP2 and 49.6% (SD 9.0%) in Group SP3 (p=0.002). The contribution of the scapulothoracic joint to the total elevation while arm lowering was 31.4% (SD 9.0%) in Group SP1, 39.0% (SD 13.0%) in Group SP2 and 49.7% (SD 12.0%) in Group SP3 (p=0.043). In frontal plane elevation (abduction) the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint was while arm raising 33.7% (SD 8.0%) in Group SP1, 34.0% (SD 10.0%) in Group SP2 and 42.3% (SD 9.0%) in Group SP3 (p=0.071). While arm lowering the contribution of the scapulothoracic joint was 30.8% (SD 10.0%) in Group SP1, 36.3% (SD 12.0%) in Group SP2 and 44.8% (SD 8.0%) in Group SP3 (p=0.022). The group SP1 achieved a Constant Score of 78.00 (SD 9.823) points. The group SP2 achieved a Constant Score of 53.57 (SD 13.92) and the group SP3 38.64 (SD 10.40). There is a significant difference between the three groups (p<0.001). Increasing severity of glenohumeral osteoarthritis leads to a reduced motion of the glenohumeral joint. Instead the magnitude of the scapulothoracic motion increases.
Level of Proof |
V, Case Series.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Glenohumeral osteoarthritis, Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic motion, 3D motion analysis, Constant Score
Plan
Vol 105 - N° 8
P. 1503-1507 - décembre 2019 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 reverse shoulder arthroplasty cases performed after failed humeral head resurfacing
- Pierre Gaeremynck, Thomas Amouyel, Marc Saab, Benjamin Gadisseux, Kevin Soudy, Christophe Szymanski, Carlos Maynou
- Epidemiology and mortality in older patients treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty for displaced proximal humerus fractures
- Emmanuel Maugendre, Benjamin Gadisseux, Christophe Chantelot, Philippe Clavert, Nassima Ramdane, Jean-David Werthel, Pascal Boileau, SOFCOT
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.