S'abonner

Optimal configuration for stability and magnetic resonance imaging quality in temporary external fixation of tibial plateau fractures - 01/04/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.12.025 
Massimo Max Morandi a, Alberto Simoncini b, Claire Hays a, John Garrett b, R. Shane Barton a, Andreas Chen a, Giovanni F. Solitro a,
a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, United States 
b Department of Radiology, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, United States 

Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, LA, United States.Shreveport, LAUnited States
Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Wednesday 01 April 2020
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder

Highlights

Tibial plateau fractures may require both external fixation and MRI so we tested constructs to find the most suitable design in both aspects.
Image artifact from external fixators is thought to affect diagnostic quality of MRI scans but we found no significant diagnostic interference.
External fixator stability improves fracture healing and varies with construct so we compared constructs to find the most stable design.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abstract

Introduction

Temporary external fixation has been widely utilized in the stabilization of plateau fractures while waiting for an optimization of the soft tissue conditions before subsequent permanent internal fixation. Simultaneously, MRI is beneficial in the assessment of concomitant damage to ligaments and menisci so that these injuries could be promptly identified, and surgical planning executed at the time of definitive fixation of the bony injury. Increasing numbers of side-bars and pins have been previously suggested to increase frame rigidity, but at the same time, several studies have indicated the presence of MRI artifacts which may obscure key anatomical structures, even when MRI-compatible fixation devices are used. This study aims to identify, among six potential configurations, the construct that maximizes stability while most minimizing the number of MRI artifacts generated among different configurations commonly used.

Hypothesis

There is one or more configurations among the others that maximize stability while preserving a clinically acceptable level of MRI quality.

Material and methods

Six constructs were recreated on cadaveric specimens and identified by the disposition of the bars: H, Anterior, Flash, Hashtag, Rhomboid, and Diamond. Stage one evaluated the amount of artifact produced during MRI on instrumented cadaveric legs, as well as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at five specific regions of interest. Stage two assessed the amount of compressional and torsional stiffness of the configurations on bone surrogate models.

Results

Image artifacts were not detected within the knee joint for all considered constructs. In terms of SNR The H, Anterior, Hashtag, and Diamond configurations were not significantly different from their control (p>0.366) while the others were significantly different (p<0.03). The values of CNR found for the H and Hashtag configurations were not significantly different from their controls (p>0.07) while the remaining configurations were significantly different (p<0.03). In compression, the H and Diamond configurations had similar stiffness (p=0.468) of 35.78N/mm and 31.44N/mm, respectively, and were stiffer than the other configurations. In torsion, the constructs have shown different stiffness (p<0.001) with a minimum value of 0.66 Nm/deg for the Rhomboid configuration, which was significantly less stiff than the Anterior configuration (1.20 Nm/deg [p<0.001]). There was no difference between the Diamond and H configurations (p=0.177) or between them and the Hashtag configuration (p=0.215).

Discussion

An external fixator construct directly bridging the femur and tibia without interconnections is the most stable and produces MRI scans without image artifacts that would interfere with diagnostic quality.

Level of evidence

V, basic science study, diagnostic imaging and mechanical testing.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Tibial plateau fracture, External fixation stability, Magnetic resonance imaging, Image artifact


Plan


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.