Médecine

Paramédical

Autres domaines


S'abonner

The different impact of trauma and relational stress on physiology, posture, and movement: Implications for treatment - 20/08/20

Doi : 10.1016/j.ejtd.2020.100172 
Pat Ogden
 Sensorimotor Psychotherapy Institute 

Sous presse. Épreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le Thursday 20 August 2020

Abstract

This paper examines two intertwining but different general categories of adversity: trauma and relational stress, including inadequate early attachment, and, later, the adversity that occurs in other important relationships and with society at large. Without conscious intent, children adapt automatically to traumatic events to assure survival, and to the inadequacies and misattunements of significant others, both individuals and groups, to maximize the resources available or at least minimize the stress. These adaptations leave scars in the form of symptoms and patterns of thinking, feeling and acting that correlate with each kind of injury. Understanding the differences in the etiology and effects of trauma and non-traumatic relational stress can help guide both general clinical approaches and specific technique (Ogden, 2009). The physical legacy of each category of adversity is different and can be seen in patterns of gesture, posture, and physiology that can obstruct the development of a rich and rewarding movement vocabulary. As well, irrational thought patterns, or cognitive distortions, arise that correspond to each category. Adaptive emotional responses in current time are superseded by both the dysregulated emotions associated with trauma and the unresolved emotions associated with misattunements of significant others that are ongoing or have not been sufficiently repaired. These physical, cognitive and emotional patterns tend to persist long after the events that elicited them are over. The repercussions of trauma combine with the stress that occurs in relationships between individuals and groups of people. Although these injuries cannot be fully separated, clinical intervention appropriate for addressing the effects of each as they emerge in the therapy hour are markedly different. Distinguishing between these categories of adversity helps clinicians prioritize appropriate clinical strategy and technique to maximize therapeutic efficacy. These clinical choices become imperative in a relationally focused, trauma informed, culturally sensitive integrative therapeutic approach.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Trauma, Attachment, Relationship, Emotion, Body, Movement, Arousal, Oppression


Plan


© 2020  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.