Shorter survival and later stage at diagnosis among unmarried patients with cutaneous melanoma: A US national and tertiary care center study - 08/09/20
Abstract |
Background |
Addressing risk factors of delayed melanoma detection minimizes disparities in outcome.
Objective |
To elucidate the significance of marital status in melanoma outcomes across anatomic sites.
Methods |
Retrospective cohort study of 73,558 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and 2992 patients at Johns Hopkins University. Patients were stratified by marital status, anatomic site, age, and sex. Endpoints were prevalence of advanced melanoma (stages III or IV) and survival.
Results |
In the SEER cohort, single patients were more likely than married patients to present in stages III or IV among both men (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-1.53) and women (PR, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.39). This trend was consistent across all anatomic sites and in all age groups, particularly in those 18 to 68 years old. Overall and cancer-specific survival times were shorter in unmarried patients. Similarly, at Johns Hopkins, single patients had increased prevalence of advanced melanoma (PR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.21-1.94) and experienced shorter overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.15-1.99).
Limitations |
The anatomic sites were not very specific, and this was a retrospective study.
Conclusions |
Unmarried patients, especially men and those younger than 68 years, are diagnosed at more advanced stages, even in readily visible sites such as the face. They also experience worse survival independent of stage.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : married, melanoma, stage, survival
Abbreviations used : PH, SEER
Plan
Funding sources: Supported by the Johns Hopkins Core for Clinical Research Data Acquisition. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None disclosed. |
|
IRB approval status: Reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins IRB. |
|
Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 83 - N° 4
P. 1012-1020 - octobre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?