A retrospective cohort study of the diagnostic value of different subtypes of atypical pigment network on dermoscopy - 08/09/20
Abstract |
Background |
Atypical network encompasses several patterns. Few studies assess the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of network subtypes.
Objective |
We assessed the diagnostic value of atypical network subtypes and their histopathologic correlates in cutaneous melanocytic lesions.
Methods |
A retrospective search (2014-2018) from a high-risk melanoma clinic for cases scored for atypical network with accompanying dermoscopic photographs yielded 120 lesions (15 melanoma; 30 severely, 38 moderately, and 32 mildly atypical nevi; 4 compound nevi; and 1 junctional nevus). A dermatopathologist blinded to diagnosis assessed dermoscopic and histologic features. Network abnormality correlates with histopathology and clinical diagnoses were assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratios.
Results |
A multivariable model with shiny white streaks (odds ratio 3.02) and inverse network (OR 4.46) was most predictive of melanoma or severe atypia. Positive predictive value for melanoma or severe atypia in decreasing order was inverse network (73.9%), shiny white streaks (71.4%), loss of network (46%), branched streaks (29.4%), and thick brown lines (28.4%).
Limitations |
Cases were retrospectively found from a pigmented lesion clinic and evaluated by a single dermatopathologist.
Conclusion |
Shiny white streaks and inverse network are most predictive of melanoma or severe atypia and warrant biopsy if found on dermoscopy.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : atypical, atypical network, branched streaks, dermis, dermoscopy, epidermis, fibroplasia, inverse network, lentiginous, loss of network, melanoma, nevi, pigment, rete, shiny white streaks, thick brown lines
Abbreviation used : OR
Plan
Authors Shi, Kim, and Mohan contributed equally to this article. |
|
Funding sources: Supported by the IDP Foundation and the Melanoma Research Foundation (SP0043559). |
|
Conflicts of interest: Dr. Gerami has served as a consultant for Myriad Genomics, DermTech Int, Merck, and Castle Biosciences and has received honoraria for this. Drs Garfield, Quan, and Panah and Authors Shi, Kim, Mohan, Zhang, Compres, and Khan have no conflicts of interest to declare. |
|
IRB approval status: Reviewed and approved by Northwestern IRB, STU1127. |
Vol 83 - N° 4
P. 1028-1034 - octobre 2020 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?