S'abonner

Clinical benefit of baseline imaging in Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of 584 patients - 11/01/21

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.065 
Neha Singh, BS a, Nora A. Alexander, BS a, Kristina Lachance, MS a, Christopher W. Lewis, MD a, b, Aubriana McEvoy, MD a, c, Gensuke Akaike, MD d, David Byrd, MD e, Sanaz Behnia, MD d, Shailender Bhatia, MD f, g, Kelly G. Paulson, MD, PhD g, Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD a, g,
a Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
b Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 
c Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri 
d Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
e Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
f Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 
g Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 

Correspondence to: Paul Nghiem, MD, PhD, University of Washington, 850 Republican St, Seattle, WA 98109.University of Washington850 Republican StSeattleWA98109

Abstract

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) guidelines derive from melanoma and do not recommend baseline cross-sectional imaging for most patients. However, MCC is more likely to have metastasized at diagnosis than melanoma.

Objective

To determine how often baseline imaging identifies clinically occult MCC in patients with newly diagnosed disease with and without palpable nodal involvement.

Methods

Analysis of 584 patients with MCC with a cutaneous primary tumor, baseline imaging, no evident distant metastases, and sufficient staging data.

Results

Among 492 patients with clinically uninvolved regional nodes, 13.2% had disease upstaged by imaging (8.9% in regional nodes, 4.3% in distant sites). Among 92 patients with clinically involved regional nodes, 10.8% had disease upstaged to distant metastatic disease. Large (>4 cm) and small (<1 cm) primary tumors were both frequently upstaged (29.4% and 7.8%, respectively). Patients who underwent positron emission tomography–computed tomography more often had disease upstaged (16.8% of 352), than those with computed tomography alone (6.9% of 231; P = .0006).

Limitations

This was a retrospective study.

Conclusions

In patients with clinically node-negative disease, baseline imaging showed occult metastatic MCC at a higher rate than reported for melanoma (13.2% vs <1%). Although imaging is already recommended for patients with clinically node-positive MCC, these data suggest that baseline imaging is also indicated for patients with clinically node-negative MCC because upstaging is frequent and markedly alters management and prognosis.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : baseline imaging, clinical guidelines, CT, distant metastasis, MCC, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, nodal metastasis, nonmelanoma skin cancer, occult disease, PET-CT, scans, sentinel lymph node biopsy, skin cancer, SLNB, staging

Abbreviations used : CT, MCC, NCCN, NNI, PET-CT, PPV, SLNB


Plan


 Authors Singh and Alexander are cofirst authors. Drs Paulson and Nghiem contributed equally to this article.
 Funding sources: Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (grants P30 CA015704, 1P01CA-225517-01A1, and T32CA009515), Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Integrated Immunotherapy Research Core, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer-Merck Cancer Immunotherapy Clinical Fellowship, and the Merkel cell carcinoma Patient Gift Fund at the University of Washington. The funding agencies did not participate in design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
 Disclosure: Dr Akaike has received grant support from Nihon Medi-Physics Co, Ltd.
 Dr Bhatia has received grant support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Emmanuel Merck, Darmstadt (EMD) Serono, Oncosec, Immune Design, and NantKwest, as well as honoraria (for advisory board participation) from Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD-Serono and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr Paulson has received grant support from SITC-Merck, Bluebird Bioscience, and EMD Serono. Dr Nghiem reports receiving grant support from EMD Serono and Bristol Myers Squibb as well as honoraria from Merck and EMD-Serono. Authors Singh and Alexander and Drs Lewis, McEvoy, Byrd, and Behnia have no conflicts of interest to declare.
 IRB approval status: Reviewed and approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center IRB (approval no. 6585).
 Reprints are not available from the authors.


© 2020  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 84 - N° 2

P. 330-339 - février 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Improved survival in women versus men with merkel cell carcinoma
  • Moses Tam, Michael Luu, Christopher A. Barker, Nima M. Gharavi, Omid Hamid, Stephen L. Shiao, Anthony T. Nguyen, Diana J. Lu, Allen S. Ho, Zachary S. Zumsteg
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Narrow excision margins are appropriate for Merkel cell carcinoma when combined with adjuvant radiation: Analysis of 188 cases of localized disease and proposed management algorithm
  • Erica S. Tarabadkar, Teresa Fu, Kristina Lachance, Daniel S. Hippe, Thomas Pulliam, Hannah Thomas, Janet Y. Li, Christopher W. Lewis, Coley Doolittle-Amieva, David R. Byrd, Jeremy T. Kampp, Upendra Parvathaneni, Paul Nghiem

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.