La psychiatrie se distingue du reste des spécialités médicales par le caractère unique de ses pathologies, qui rend importante la réflexion éthique. Cette dernière peut être affectée par une subjectivité et des influences diverses d’où l’intérêt d’étudier l’attitude des psychiatres et internes en psychiatrie au Liban vis-à-vis de la contention et du consentement éclairé.

Le recueil des données a été réalisé après envoi, d’un questionnaire, anonyme, sous forme de Google form, aux psychiatres et internes en psychiatrie par courrier électronique et messages téléphoniques. L’analyse statistique a été effectuée à l’aide des logiciel Microsoft Excel, SPSS et des tests statistiques suivants : test sur échantillon indépendant et test de Mann Whitney U.

Quarante personnes ont répondu, parmi lesquelles on retrouve 19 hommes et 21 femmes, 16 internes en psychiatrie, 15 psychiatres universitaires et 9 psychiatres non universitaires. Bien que 70 % trouvent que la contention est une mesure peu fréquente dans la pratique hospitalière au Liban, 92,5 % la justifient en tant que mesure sécuritaire et 60 % en tant que mesure thérapeutique. Quant au consentement, 90 % ont considéré un patient en état psychotique d’emblée inapte à consentir.

Dans notre échantillon, le recours aux mesures coercitives n’est pas fréquent, le but de ces dernières lorsqu’elles sont employées est largement sécuritaire. Aucune différence significative n’a été constatée entre les différents sous-groupes, qui proviendraient donc d’une seule population.

Psychiatry differs from the rest of medical specialties by the unique character of its pathologies, which makes ethical reflection difficult, including the collection of informed consent and the use of restraint and the seclusion-room. This reflection can be affected by subjectivity and a variety of influences, hence the interest of studying the attitude of psychiatrists and residents in psychiatry in Lebanon with regard to restraint and informed consent.

We collected data using an anonymous questionnaire that we sent as a Google form to Lebanese psychiatrists and psychiatry residents by email and phone messages. The descriptive analysis was done using Microsoft Excel software, and the analytical analysis was done using the SPSS software and the following statistical tests: independent-sample test and the Mann Whitney U test.

Forty people responded, including 19 men and 21 women (16 psychiatric interns, 15 university psychiatrists and 9 non-university psychiatrists). Concerning the questions related to the use of restraint, 70% did not find that it is being commonly used in hospital practice. However, 92.5% would use it to counter the patient's dangerousness and 60% to help deliver treatment. 57.5% did not find the repeated usage of restraint as a dehumanization of care, but the majority (70%) agreed with the need for temporal limitation of any form of restraint. As for the ability to consent, 90% considered a patient in a psychotic state as unfit to consent.

Restraint is considered uncommon by psychiatrists and psychiatric residents in Lebanon and must remain an option of last resort with efforts being made upstream in order to avoid situations where the use of restraint becomes mandatory. Post critical thinking is paramount, and restraint should never respond to a lack of manpower or a security goal. Informed consent is one of the most important guarantors of the principle of autonomy, and must be sought in each patient, individually. Finally, no significant difference was found between the subgroups, which would therefore become a single population. Ethical reflection would therefore be directly linked to the population. Mental illnesses are becoming more common and an important source of morbidity worldwide. It is our role to ensure the dignity of the mentally ill. The introduction of the Psychiatric Nurse Diploma, an increase in the relational approach to the training of psychiatrists in Lebanon, and an increase in the number of health care teams may help to maximize the ability of capacity.