Evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances taken from 3D printed models with varied shell thicknesses: An in vitro study - 23/02/21
pages | 10 |
Iconographies | 2 |
Vidéos | 0 |
Autres | 0 |
Highlights |
• | Print shell thickness did significantly affect dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances. |
• | Thin, hollow models undergo deformation during thermoforming, in turn affecting appliances. |
• | Orthodontists should consider the minimum shell thicknesses appropriate to ensure clinical utility. |
• | A minimum shell thickness of 2.0 mm should be used to mitigate dimensional deformations. |
Summary |
Objective |
Clinicians make numerous decisions when 3D printing models for fabrication of thermoformed appliances, including printing solid or hollow models. While hollow models can reduce resin use, models intended for thermoformed appliance fabrication must be printed with sufficient thickness to withstand thermoforming. The aim of the study was to determine for hollow 3D printed orthodontic models if there is an effect of shell thickness on the dimensional accuracy of retainers thermoformed upon them as compared with solid models and, if so, to identify the minimum shell thickness that ensures dimensional accuracy of the thermoformed retainer under the conditions investigated.
Material and methods |
Thermoformed appliances were fabricated on 3D printed models of six shell thicknesses: 1.0mm, 1.5mm, 2.0mm, 2.5mm, 3.0mm, and solid (n=10/group). The models were scanned before and after thermoforming. Thermoformed appliances were captured by two methods: scanning a polyvinylsiloxane casting of the appliance and scanning the appliance interior surface (intaglio surface). Each model-appliance pair was compared using superimposition software. A generalized linear model and post-hoc Tukey contrasts (α=0.05) were applied to compare each thickness.
Results |
Model thickness has a statistically significant effect on dimensional accuracy of thermoformed appliances. Appliances fabricated on 1.0mm and 1.5mm models displayed poor accuracy, with a statistically significantly lower percentage of data points within tolerance (±0.250mm) than appliances fabricated on models printed at 2.0mm thickness and greater.
Conclusions |
3D printed model thickness affects the dimensional accuracy of a thermoformed retainer. To ensure minimal deformation and promote clinical utility of the thermoformed appliance, models should be printed with a minimum shell thickness of 2.0mm for the materials investigated.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Orthodontic Appliances, Removable*, Printing Three-Dimensional*, Stereolithography
Plan
Vol 19 - N° 1
P. 137-146 - mars 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?