Narrow resection margins are not associated with mortality or recurrence in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: A retrospective study - 10/03/21
Abstract |
Background |
Wide local excision constitutes the standard of care for Merkel cell carcinoma, but the optimal margin width remains controversial.
Objectives |
To assess whether narrow margins (0.5-1 cm) were associated with outcome.
Methods |
Patients were recruited from a retrospective French multicentric cohort and included if they had had excision of primary tumor with minimum lateral margins of 0.5 cm. Factors associated with mortality and recurrence were assessed by multivariate regression.
Results |
Among the 214 patients included, 58 (27.1%) had undergone excision with narrow margins (0.5-1 cm) versus 156 (72.9%) with wide margins (>1 cm). During a median follow-up of 50.7 months, cancer-specific survival did not differ between groups (5-year specific survival rate 76.8% [95% confidence interval 61.7%-91.9%] and 76.2% [95% confidence interval 68.8%-83.6%], respectively). Overall survival, any recurrence-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival did not significantly differ between groups. Cancer-specific mortality was associated with age, male sex, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III, and presence of positive margins.
Limitations |
Retrospective design, heterogenous baseline characteristics between groups.
Conclusion |
Excision with narrow margins was not associated with outcome in this cohort, in which most patients had clear margins and postoperative radiation therapy. Residual tumor, mostly found on deep surgical margins, was independently associated with prognosis.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : general surgery, Merkel cell carcinoma, mortality, neoplasms, prognosis, skin surgical margins, wide local excision
Abbreviations used : AJCC, CI, HR, MCC
Plan
Funding sources: This work was supported by La Ligue Contre le Cancer (Indre-et-Loire, France) and HUGO (Hopitaux Universitaires du Grand Ouest, France). |
|
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. |
|
IRB approval status: The work was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tours, France (ID RCB 2009-A01056-51). |
|
Reprints not available from the authors. |
Vol 84 - N° 4
P. 921-929 - avril 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?