The Role of Fetal MRI for Suspected Anomalies of the Posterior Fossa - 24/03/21

Abstract |
Background |
Posterior fossa anomalies can be diagnostic dilemmas during the fetal period. The prognosis for different diagnoses of the posterior fossa varies widely. We investigated whether fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prenatal neurology consultation led to an alternate prognosis for fetuses referred due to concern for a fetal posterior fossa anomaly and concordance between pre- and postnatal diagnoses.
Methods |
This is a retrospective study of cases referred to the Prenatal Pediatrics Institute at Children’s National Hospital from January 2012 to June 2018 due to concern for posterior fossa anomaly. Each encounter was scored for change in prognosis based upon clinical and fetal MRI report. Postnatal imaging was compared with prenatal imaging when available.
Results |
In total, 180 cases were referred for fetal posterior fossa anomalies based on outside obstetric ultrasound and had both fetal MRI and a neurology consultation. Fetal MRI and neurology consultation resulted in a change in fetal prognosis in 70% of cases. The most common referral diagnosis in our cohort was Dandy-Walker continuum, but it was not often confirmed by fetal MRI. In complex cases, posterior fossa diagnosis and prognosis determined by fetal MRI impacted choices regarding pregnancy management. Postnatal imaging was obtained in 57 (47%) live-born infants. Fetal and postnatal prognoses were similar in 60%.
Conclusions |
Fetal diagnosis affects pregnancy management decisions. The fetal-postnatal imaging agreement of 60% highlights the conundrum of balancing the timing of fetal MRI to provide the most accurate diagnosis of the posterior fossa abnormalities in time to make pregnancy management decisions.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Congenital brain abnormality, Posterior fossa, Fetal neurology, Dandy-Walker malformation, Blake pouch cyst, Prenatal imaging, Vermis hypoplasia
Plan
Author Contributions: Dr. Schlatterer designed the study, acquired and analyzed data, scored cases for prognosis, and drafted the manuscript. Dr. Sanapo participated in study design, discussion, and manuscript revision. Dr. du Plessis participated in conception and study design. Dr. Whitehead reviewed MRI images and participated in study design and manuscript revision. Dr. Mulkey designed the study, scored cases for prognosis, and drafted the manuscript with Dr. Schlatterer. |
|
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. |
Vol 117
P. 10-18 - avril 2021 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?