We discuss from a historical perspective whether the 1931 description of the “unstable ataxic hand” by Théophile Alajouanine, the fifth successor of Charcot at la Salpêtrière, and the Brazilian neurologist Abraham Akerman, then studying in France, merits being considered a distinct contribution vis-à-vis the earlier description by Oppenheim of the “useless hand syndrome”. The specific object of the article by Alajouanine and Akerman was a semiologic sign, namely a pseudoathetosis localized in the hand, while the original description by Oppenheim of the symptom-complex that came to be known as useless hand syndrome did not include an abnormal movement. Moreover, as a result of the useless hand syndrome originating from a clinical classification of multiple sclerosis based on the localization of the lesions, it involves topographic and etiologic diagnoses specificities. In contrast, the unstable ataxic hand can be observed in the useless hand syndrome and other syndromes involving predominantly sensory symptoms, such as “numb clumsy hands” due to high cervical spondylosis or extramedullary tumor, and the “cortical sensory syndrome” most commonly due to parietal stroke. Because it had not been thoroughly described in the context of a symptom-complex, Alajouanine and Akerman's unstable ataxic hand merits being considered a distinct and valuable contribution.