Les résultats cliniques de la réparation du LCA ne sont pas inférieurs à ceux de la reconstruction : analyse appariée de 75 patients du SANTI Study Group - 30/11/21
Clinical outcomes following ACL repair are non-inferior to ACL reconstruction: A matched-pair analysis from the SANTI Study Group
, Adnan Saithna 4, Alessandro Carrozzo 5, Sylvain Guy 3, Thais Dutra Vieira 1Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
| pages | 2 |
| Iconographies | 0 |
| Vidéos | 0 |
| Autres | 0 |
Résumé |
Introduction |
ACL reconstruction is the gold standard of surgical treatment for ACL tears. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in ACL repair, and early results are promising. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following ACL repair versus ACL reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of two years.
Matériel et méthode |
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was undertaken. Patients who underwent ACL repair were matched 1 :1 to those who underwent ACL reconstruction using a propensity score. All patients underwent a return to sports evaluation (isokinetic test, K-START and ACL-RSI) at 6 months post-operatively. At final face-to-face follow-up, physical examination findings (including side to side laxity difference & pivot shift) were recorded. At final overall follow-up return to sport, complications, re-operations and outcome measures, including Lysholm, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), ACL-RSI, Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) were recorded.
Résultats |
Eighty-two patients with ACL repair were matched with 82 patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction. 7 matched pairs were lost to follow-up, leaving 75 patients in each group. At 6 months postoperatively, the ACL repair group had a lower mean hamstring muscle deficit (1.7 %±12.8) (p<0.0001). At a mean final follow-up of 30±4.8 months, non-inferiority criteria were met for ACL repair with respect to both the IKDC subjective score (ACL repair, 86.8 points ; ACL reconstruction, 86.7 points ; p<0.0001) and side-to-side antero-posterior laxity (ACL repair 1.0mm ; ACL reconstruction, 0.6mm ; p<0.0001). Furthermore, the ACL repair group had better FJS (82.0±15.1) compared to ACL reconstruction (74.2±21.7) (p=0.017) and no significant differences were observed regarding the occurrence of ACL graft rupture (ACL repair, 5,3 % ; ACL reconstruction, 0 % ; p=0.617).
Conclusions |
The outcomes of ACL repair were non-inferior to ACL reconstruction with respect to IKDC subjective scores and anteroposterior laxity. ACL repair was associated with better forgotten joint score and superior hamstring strength, without increase in graft rupture rates. ACL repair can be considered a useful option in carefully selected patients.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Vol 107 - N° 8S
P. S268-S269 - décembre 2021 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Instabilité antérolatérale aiguë du genou chez l’adulte : une réparation combinée des lésions proximales du LCA et des lésions de l’ALL n’est pas inférieure à une reconstruction standard du LCA avec ténodèse latérale à 2 ans de recul
- Andrea Ferretti, Alessandro Carrozzo, Alessandro Annibaldi, Edoardo Monaco
- Suture du LCA : comparaison avec la reconstruction du LCA avec évaluation par IRM
- Edoardo Monaco, Adnan Saithna, Alessandro Carrozzo, Alessandro Annibaldi, Fabio Marzilli, Andrea Ferretti
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’achat d’article à l’unité est indisponible à l’heure actuelle.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?