Outcomes of spinal cord injury peer mentorship: a community-based Delphi consensus approach - 02/06/22
, Emilie Michalovic 1, 2, Rhyann McKay 3, 4, Heather L. Gainforth 3, 4, Christopher B. McBride 5, Teren Clarke 6, Sheila Casemore 7, Shane N. Sweet 1, 2Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
Abstract |
Peer mentorship programs delivered by community-based spinal cord injury (SCI) organizations target numerous outcomes. This study aims to reach agreement on which outcomes were the most important for SCI peer mentorship programs delivered by community-based organizations. We designed two sequential Delphi consensus studies. In Study 1, peer mentors, mentees, organizational staff of SCI community-based organizations participated. Participants rated the importance of 87 outcomes across three rounds. In Study 2, executive directors/CEOs and frontline peer mentorship staff members rated the importance to measure the outcomes drawn from Study 1 across two rounds. 25 outcomes were retained in Study 1. 21 outcomes were retained in Study 2, which were deemed as the most important for SCI peer mentorship programs delivered by community-based organizations. These outcomes will inform the co-development of a SCI peer mentorship evaluation tool.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Spinal cord injury, Peer mentorship, Community program, Delphi
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?