S'abonner

Overview on advantages & disadvantages of alternative matrices - 15/08/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.toxac.2022.06.318 
Elena Lendoiro
 Servicio de Toxicología Forense, Instituto de Ciencias Forenses Luis Concheiro, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain 

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Résumé

Objective

To describe the advantages and disadvantages of alternative matrices in the field of clinical and forensic toxicology.

Methods

A review of the characteristics and limitations of the most relevant alternative matrices have been conducted. Moreover, the main applications of the analysis of alternative matrices have been detail focusing on its usefulness in the resolution of real forensic and clinical cases.

Results

The advance in more sensible testing methodologies have been permitted the analysis of other biological specimens, traditionally inaccessible. Different alternative biological matrices can be used in clinical and forensic toxicological cases to obtain additional information to those obtain by the analysis of traditional matrices. Moreover, these matrices can be used to resolve problems or impediments of traditional matrices, such as invasive sample collection, detection of long-term exposure, contamination or postmortem redistribution… Some of the most used alternative matrices nowadays are hair, oral fluid, meconium or vitreous humor. The main advantage of hair analysis is the possibility to extend the window of detection to months or even years and perform a chronological profile of drug consumption. Hair analysis is applied to cases of driving license regranting, drug-facilitated crimes, determination of gestational drug exposure or verification of drug-use history, among others. Its main limitation is the lack of dose/concentration correlation and the issue of external contamination. Oral fluid has a comparable window of detection with blood, but with an easier and non-invasive sample collection. However, oral fluid has a limited dose/concentration correlation and there is the possibility of buccal and passive exposure contamination. The use of oral fluid for investigating impaired driving at the roadside and for testing drug-use at workplace has exponentially increased recently, showing the potential of this matrix as an alternative to blood in detecting recent consumption. Meconium can provide information of in utero drug exposure from the second and mainly third trimester of pregnancy, with an easy and non-invasive collection. However, in some cases this matrix cannot be available, is a non-homogenous sample and require sensitive and complex methodologies. Finally, vitreous humor is a very interesting postmortem sample for determining ethanol, but also other drugs of abuse, due to it is anatomically isolated (minimizing postmortem redistribution) and protected from putrefaction. Vitreous humor volume is low and data about drug concentrations in this matrix is limited and the interpretation is complex.

Discussion

The analysis of alternative matrices in isolation or in combination with traditional matrices can improve the resolution of clinical and forensic toxicological cases. The main advantages of alternative samples are an easy and non-invasive collection, while the main disadvantages are the necessity of sensitive methodologies and the lack of dose/concentration correlation. Moreover, the interpretation of the information provided by alternative matrices should be performed taking into account the characteristics of those samples.

Conclusion

The use of alternative matrices in clinical and forensic toxicology complements the information provide by traditional matrices, specially when traditional matrices are not available, their collection is invasive, or drugs are no longer detect in them.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


© 2022  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 34 - N° 3S

P. S16-S17 - septembre 2022 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Scientific General Program
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • How clinical toxicology service can contribute in forensic cases?
  • Rafael Lanaro

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.