S'abonner

Antidiabetic agents and risk of atrial fibrillation/flutter: a comparative critical analysis with a focus on differences between SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists - 25/09/22

Doi : 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101390 
André J. Scheen 1, 2,
1 Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium 
2 Division of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Medicine, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium 

Corresponding author
Sous presse. Manuscrit accepté. Disponible en ligne depuis le Sunday 25 September 2022
Cet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder

Highlights

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an independent risk factor for cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL)
AF/AFL is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the general population and event more in patients with T2DM
Glucose-lowering agents exert distinct protective effects on new-onset AF/AFL episodes, beyond different effects on cardiovascular outcomes
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) showed the strongest protective effect against incident AF/AFL, compared with other glucose-lowering agents, especially incretin-based therapies
The benefit of SGLT2is on the risk of AF/AFL is consistent in randomised controlled trials/cardiovascular outcome trials, retrospective observational studies and pharmacovigilance reports
Whether this anti-arrhythmic effect is related to the remarkable effect of SGLT2is on heart failure issues remains an open question.
Why this anti-arrhythmic effect of SGLT2is is not accompanied by a proportional reduction in ischaemic stroke events deserves further dedicated investigations

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Summary

Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) is a common cardiac arrhythmia in patients with diabetes and is associated with an increased risk of morbidity, including ischaemic stroke and heart failure, and mortality. Different classes of glucose-lowering agents have shown distinct effects on the risk of stroke and heart failure. Their effects on cardiac arrhythmias such as AF/AFL have not been carefully investigated yet and even less their possible relationship with classical complications such as stroke and heart failure. The present comprehensive review aims at analysing the effects of each pharmacological class on the risk of new-onset AF/AFL episodes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in patients with heart failure (with or without diabetes). Relevant findings were collected both in post-hoc analyses of placebo-controlled trials and in real-life retrospective observational studies, which both led to the publication of several meta-analyses. Of note, no randomised controlled trials evaluated the effects on AF/AFL as a pre-specified endpoint and none included head-to-head active drugs comparisons, so that caution is required in the conclusion. Overall, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, besides their remarkable effects on heart failure issues, were associated with the most pronounced and consistent reduction in incident AF/AFL, an effect surprisingly not accompanied by a significant reduction in stroke. In contrast, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, which have proven their ability to reduce stroke, apparently failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in new-onset AF/AFL in most reports. A better understanding of both reasons for these discrepancies and underlying mechanisms supporting the drug antiarrhythmic effect requires further careful dedicated studies.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key-words : Atrial fibrillation, Cardiac arrhythmia, Glucose-lowering agent, Heart failure, Stroke, Type 2 diabetes


Plan


 A.J. Scheen has received lecturer/scientific advisor/clinical investigator fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NovoNordisk and Sanofi. He worked as clinical investigators in TECOS, LEADER, HARMONY OUTCOME, PIONEER 6, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS-R and DECLARE-TIMI 58 cardiovascular outcome trials.


© 2022  Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.