Influence of Stimuli Spatial Proximity on a SSVEP-Based BCI Performance - 07/12/22
Abstract |
Objective: Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials based Brain-Computer Interfaces (SSVEP-based BCIs) systems have been shown as promising technology due to their short response time and ease of use. SSVEP-based BCIs use brain responses to a flickering visual stimulus as an input command to an external application or device, and it can be influenced by stimulus properties, signal recording, and signal processing. We aim to investigate the system performance varying the stimuli spatial proximity (a stimulus property).
Material and methods: We performed a comparative analysis of two visual interface designs (named cross and square) for an SSVEP-based BCI. The power spectrum density (PSD) was used as feature extraction and the Support Machine Vector (SVM) as classification method. We also analyzed the effects of five flickering frequencies (6.67, 8.57, 10, 12 e 15 Hz) between and within interfaces.
Results: We found higher accuracy rates for the flickering frequencies of 10, 12, and 15 Hz. The stimulus of 10 Hz presented the highest SSVEP amplitude response for both interfaces. The system presented the best performance (highest classification accuracy and information transfer rate) using the cross interface (lower visual angle).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the system has the highest performance in the spatial proximity range from 4° to 13° (visual angle). In addition, we conclude that as the stimulus spatial proximity increases, the interference from other stimuli reduces, and the SSVEP amplitude response decreases, which reduces system accuracy. The inter-stimulus distance is a visual interface parameter that must be chosen carefully to increase the efficiency of an SSVEP-based BCI.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Highlights |
• | A spatial proximity from 4° to 13° visual angle results in higher BCI performance. |
• | As inter-stimulus distance increases, the SSVEP amplitude response decreases. |
• | A stimulus at 10 Hz presented the highest SSVEP amplitude response. |
• | The BCI performance is higher when the cross interface is adopted. |
Keywords : Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEP), Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI), Spatial proximity, Inter-stimulus distance, Visual interface
Plan
Vol 43 - N° 6
P. 621-627 - décembre 2022 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?