Tridimensional analysis of the normal upper airways in non-dentofacial deformity patients - 24/02/26
, B.C. Ribeiro, P.F. Bertelli Trivellato, C.E. Sverzut, A.E. TrivellatoHighlights |
• | This study provides a foundational three-dimensional dataset of normal airway measurements for adult patients who do not have dentofacial deformities or diagnosed sleep apnea. |
• | Airway volume is significantly influenced by demographic and anatomical factors. |
• | A neck circumference below 40 cm is a strong indicator of a smaller airway, compared to the average. |
• | In a healthy, diverse population, the mean three-dimensional airway volume was determined to be 0,24 cm 3 . |
• | These normative values offer a crucial baseline for surgeons and clinicians to improve respiratory risk assessment, screening, and individualized treatment planning, particularly in orthognathic surgery. |
Summary |
Objectives |
To establish normative three-dimensional airway measurements in patients without dentofacial deformities (DDFs) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and to identify anatomical and epidemiological factors associated with airway volume.
Methods |
This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed 200 CT scans from patients aged 18–80 years, with no diagnosis of DDF, OSA, or craniofacial syndromes. Scans were processed using artificial intelligence software (NEMOFAB) for automatic segmentation and volumetric analysis. Variables assessed included age, sex, neck circumference, and craniofacial linear distances (Menton–Hyoid, Menton–3rd Vertebrae, PNS–Hyoid, Soft Palate–Hyoid). Airway volume and Minimum Axial Area (MAA) were measured and compared using ANOVA.
Results |
The mean airway volume was 24,724.8 mm 3 . Younger individuals exhibited greater airway volumes, especially among males. Patients with a neck circumference < 40 cm had a 28.04% reduction in airway volume. Longer PNS–Hyoid, SPH, and M3 V distances were positively associated with increased airway volume, while Menton–Hyoid showed minimal impact. A low MAA ( < 110 mm 2 ) correlated with a significant volume decrease. Key predictors identified were age, neck circumference, PNS–Hyoid, SPH, and M3 V distances.
Conclusions |
In patients without DDF or OSA, airway volume is significantly influenced by demographic and anatomical variables. These normative data provide a baseline for comparison in orthognathic surgical planning and respiratory risk assessment.
Clinical Relevance |
Understanding normal airway morphology and its anatomical determinants enhances screening for patients at risk of airway compromise and may guide individualized treatment strategies in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Keywords : Airway, Obstructive sleep apnea, Orthognathic surgery
Plan
Vol 110 - N° 368
Article 101078- mars 2026 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
