Quantifying Research Productivity in the 2024-2025 Urology Residency Match: A Bibliometric Analysis of Verified Publication Rates - 27/03/26
, Adrian Bozocea, Martha K. TerrisCet article a été publié dans un numéro de la revue, cliquez ici pour y accéder
ABSTRACT |
Objective |
Our objective was to characterize PubMed-indexed research productivity among all matched applicants in the 2024-2025 Urology Residency Match and evaluate its association with residency program tier in the post-USMLE Step 1 pass/fail era.
Methods |
PGY1 urology residents were identified through independent verification of publicly available residency program rosters. PubMed-indexed publications completed prior to application submission were identified and verified using a standardized attribution framework. Programs were stratified into 5 tiers based on Doximity 2025-2026 reputation rankings. Publication counts were compared across tiers using nonparametric testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed publication thresholds associated with matching into higher-tier programs.
Results |
Among 418 matched residents, 1313 PubMed-indexed publications were identified. The median publication count was 1 (interquartile range 0-3), and 28.0% of matched applicants had no publications at the time of application. Research productivity differed significantly across program tiers ( P < .0001), with higher-tier programs demonstrating greater publication volume and a higher concentration of high-output outliers. ROC analysis demonstrated moderate discrimination for top-tier program matching (area under the curve 0.64). A threshold of approximately 2 publications optimized discrimination, with diminishing returns observed at higher publication counts.
Conclusion |
Research productivity among matched urology applicants is highly heterogeneous but demonstrates a graded association with residency program tier. Approximately 2 PubMed-indexed publications maximize probabilistic discrimination for higher-tier matching, supporting focused scholarly engagement rather than high-volume output. These findings provide contemporary benchmarks for applicants and program directors.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Plan
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
