S'abonner

Advertising in dermatology journals: Journals’ and journal editors’ policies, practices, and attitudes - 09/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.01.046 
Cynthia L. Bartus, BS b, Kenneth A. Katz, MD, MSc a, b,
a From the Department of Dermatology 
b University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine 

Reprint requests: Kenneth A. Katz, MD, MSc, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3600 Spruce St, 2 Maloney Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Background

Problems in some advertisements in medical journals, including dermatology journals, have been identified in various studies. Examples have included poorly supported claims, failure to balance claims of efficacy with potential adverse effects of a drug, and slogans that recommend prescribing a drug for groups of patients different from those assessed in a referenced study.

Objective

We sought to assess dermatology journals’ and dermatology journal editors’ policies, practices, and attitudes toward prescription-medicine advertising in dermatology journals.

Methods

We searched dermatology journals’ paper copies and World Wide Web sites for statements of advertising policy and sent surveys to dermatology journal editors.

Results

Of 22 journals, 8 (36.4%) had an advertising policy published in a paper copy or a World Wide Web site. Of 17 editors (70.8%) from 17 journals (77.3%) who responded to the survey, 3 reported having an advertising policy; these policies were also identified in searches of paper copies or World Wide Web sites. Two editors whose journals each had a published policy reported not having one. In all, 7 editors (41.2%) reported that they or other physician members of the editorial board reviewed advertisements before publication in the previous year. A total of 8 editors (47.1%) agreed somewhat or strongly that advertisements in medical journals, including dermatology journals, generally present information that is accurate, and 12 (70.6%) agreed somewhat or strongly with the same statement regarding advertisements appearing in their own journal. In all, 12 editors (70.6%) agreed somewhat or strongly that advertisements should be reviewed for accuracy by the editorial staff before publication, and 3 (17.6%) agreed somewhat or strongly that advertisements should be reviewed for accuracy before publication in a peer-review process similar to that used for submitted manuscripts.

Limitations

This study did not assess processes by which editors or other members of editorial or publishing staffs review advertisements before publication.

Conclusions

Policies, practices, and attitudes toward advertising vary among dermatology journals and dermatology journal editors. Journals, especially those without a policy, should consider establishing policies to separate and, therefore, minimize conflicts of interest between editorial and business aspects of publication.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Supported by a fellowship from Kirschstein National Research Service Award from the National Institutes of Health (Dr Katz).
Conflicts of interest: None identified.
Presented in part in poster and oral presentations at the Society for Investigative Dermatology Meeting, St Louis, Mo, May 4-7, 2005.


© 2006  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 55 - N° 1

P. 116-122 - juillet 2006 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Eosinophilic dermatoses
  • Warren R. Heymann
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Surgical Pearl: A technique for placement of buried sutures
  • Jamie Lynn McGinness, Mark Russell

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.