Médecine

Paramédical

Autres domaines


S'abonner

Clinical e-mail in an academic dermatology setting - 09/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.046 
Kevin F. Kia, BS, Anna Tavakkoli, Charles N. Ellis, MD
From the Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School and the Dermatology Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System 

Reprint requests: Charles N. Ellis, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0314.

Ann Arbor, Michigan

Abstract

Background

Use of e-mail among patients and physicians is limited by reservations over issues such as medicolegal aspects, reimbursement, and time-management.

Objective

Our purpose was to identify the content of patient-related e-mails in an academic dermatology practice and determine whether clinical questions could be answered by e-mail.

Methods

The first 100 e-mails received each year that related to patients from January 1, 2000 to June 1, 2005 (plus any messages received in e-mail threads started in the original 100) were studied (N = 614). E-mails were sent by patients, potential patients, or physicians in reference to a patient. E-mails were divided into 8 categories on the basis of content. E-mails were subdivided as relating to new (patients who had never been seen in-person) or established patients. All clinical questions were categorized as to whether they were answered by e-mail. The average number of e-mails received per e-mail thread was tallied.

Results

E-mails were distributed as follows: clinical question from a physician (20%), clinical question from a patient (17%), appointment request (18%), request for referral to another physician (7%), prescription refill (3%), research inquiry (2%), thank-you correspondence (31%), other (17%). Percentages do not equal 100 because some e-mails contained more than one subject. Clinical questions were more likely to be answered when posed by physicians (100%) than patients (70%; P = .001), and when from established (79%) versus new patients (60%; P = .02). There were fewer e-mails per thread for queries from physicians (1.6 messages received) versus patients (2.2; P < .001) and for established (1.6) versus new patients (2.2; P < .001).

Limitations

This study was limited to the experience of one dermatologist in an academic setting.

Conclusion

E-mail broadens communication between patients and their dermatologist. E-mail may facilitate consultation with other physicians and management of patients with chronic disease. “Thank-you” responses engage a substantial amount of e-mail resources.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Supported by the clinical funds of and alumni donations to the University of Michigan, Department of Dermatology.
Conflicts of interest: None.
Presented in poster format at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, San Francisco, March 3-7, 2006.


© 2006  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 54 - N° 6

P. 1019-1024 - juin 2006 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • On the move?
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Imiquimod 5% cream monotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen’s disease): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
  • Girish K. Patel, Richard Goodwin, Maureen Chawla, Peter Laidler, Patricia E. Price, Andrew Y. Finlay, Richard J. Motley

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

;

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.