S'abonner

Delayed treatment and continued growth of nonmelanoma skin cancer - 10/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.06.028 
Murad Alam, MD, MSCI a, b, c, , Leonard H. Goldberg, MD, FRCP h, l, Sirunya Silapunt, MD f, Erin S. Gardner, MD m, Sara S. Strom, PhD g, Alfred W. Rademaker, PhD d, e, David J. Margolis, MD, MSCE, PhD i, j, k
a Section of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 
b Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 
c Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 
d Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 
e Biostatistics Core Facility, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 
f Department of Dermatology, University of Texas–Houston, Houston, Texas 
g Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 
h Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 
i Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
j Department of Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
k Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
l DermSurgery Associates, Houston, Texas 
m Aesthetic Derm Surgery, St Louis, Missouri 

Reprint requests: Murad Alam, MD, MSCI, Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, 676 N St Clair, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611.

Abstract

Background

Patients may delay treatment for skin cancer for various reasons. Prior research on treatment delay has focused on melanoma rather than nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), which is much more common.

Objective

We sought to clarify the reasons for delay in the presentation for diagnosis and treatment of NMSC.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study in a Mohs micrographic surgery private practice in an urban setting. Eligible subjects were 982 consecutive patients presenting for Mohs micrographic surgery for NMSC between March and December 2005. No enrolled subjects were withdrawn for adverse effects. The survey was a 4-page written self-administered questionnaire, eliciting patient medical history, skin cancer history, demographic information, initial and subsequent lesion size, and reasons for delay in presentation for evaluation and management. Outcome analyses addressed the: (1) frequency of specific reasons for delayed presentation, as provided by self-report; (2) association between reasons for delay with demographic or other patient-specific factors; and (3) change in lesion diameter from the time of detection by the patient to the time of presentation to the doctor.

Results

Among the reasons for waiting, denial (including: thought it would go away, thought it wasn't important, too busy, thought they could self-treat, afraid it might be something dangerous) was the most frequent, accounting for 71% of cases; difficulty scheduling was associated with 10% of the instances of delay. Older patients (age >64 years) were more likely to wait to seek care than younger patients (odd ratio [OR] = 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7). Patients with a prior skin cancer were more likely to wait (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-2.0), as were patients with major life problems (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.6-4.3) and patients with a history of any cancer (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.4). Weighted kappa analysis comparing tumor size at the two time points yielded a kappa of 0.72 (SE = .02; 95% CI 0.68-0.77). When the data were separated into two groups, one including those tumors that had decreased in size or remained the same (698 patients), and those that had increased in size (120 patients), the median delay-to-presentation intervals associated with these two groups (2.5 vs 6.0 months, respectively) were found to be significantly different (P < .0001).

Limitations

This study may have limited generalizability to the extent that it reflects the characteristics only of the subpopulation of patients with skin cancer who eventually received treatment at a referral-based, urban, dermatology private practice. Overall, these patients may have been better insured and be more affluent than the general population.

Conclusions

Denial is the most common patient-specific factor accounting for delayed presentation for NMSC diagnosis and treatment. Patients younger than 65 years, with a skin cancer history, with major life problems, and with a history of any cancer were most likely to wait to see a doctor. There was a significant increase in tumor size from the time when tumors were noticed by patients to the time when patients presented to a physician. Increased delay was associated with increased tumor growth.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : basal cell carcinoma, delay, denial, nonmelanoma skin cancer


Plan


 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2010  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 64 - N° 5

P. 839-848 - mai 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Propranolol, a very promising treatment for ulceration in infantile hemangiomas: A study of 20 cases with matched historical controls
  • Denise Josephina Johanna Hermans, Ingrid Mathilde van Beynum, Leonardus Jan Schultze Kool, Peter Cornelius Maria van de Kerkhof, Marcus Henricus Wilhelmus Andreas Wijnen, Catharina Joanna Maria van der Vleuten
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Quality of life in cutaneous lupus erythematosus
  • Rachel Klein, Siamak Moghadam-Kia, Lynne Taylor, Christopher Coley, Joyce Okawa, Jonathan LoMonico, Mary-Margaret Chren, Victoria P. Werth

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.