S'abonner

In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of mycosis fungoides: A preliminary study - 19/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.026 
Anna Liza C. Agero, MD a, , Melissa Gill, MD b, , Marco Ardigo, MD a, Patricia Myskowski, MD a, Allan C. Halpern, MS, MD a, Salvador González, MD, PhD a,
a From the Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine 
b Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 

Reprint requests: Salvador González, MD, PhD, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 160 E 53 St, New York, NY 10022.

New York, New York

Abstract

Background

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a diagnostic challenge, frequently needing multiple and sequential biopsies to establish the diagnosis.

Objective

Our aim was to evaluate lesions suggestive of MF using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and to correlate confocal features with histopathologic findings.

Methods

A total of 8 lesions from 7 patients either with a history of biopsy-proven MF or with lesions clinically suggestive of MF were imaged with RCM followed by a skin punch biopsy. These 8 lesions were confirmed to be MF by histopathology: patch type (n = 3), plaque type (n = 4), and tumor type (n = 1).

Results

Under RCM, epidermal findings in patch lesions were subtle, as on histopathology, while the most prominent changes were observed in plaque type MF. At the level of the epidermis, weakly refractile oval to round structures within the spinous layer were observed in all MF lesions, but were difficult to distinguish from surrounding keratinocytes; these structures corresponded to epidermotropic lymphocytes on histopathology. In plaque-type lesions, vesicle-like dark spaces filled with collections of monomorphous weakly refractile oval to round cells were clearly elucidated by RCM; these structures corresponded to Pautrier’s microabscesses on histopathology. RCM was also able to demonstrate spongiosis in the MF lesions, with findings of epidermal architectural disarray, areas with thickened and blurred intercellular demarcations, and epidermal cells with elongated nuclei. At the dermoepidermal junction, the basal cells surrounding the dermal papillae appeared as only faintly refractile rings on RCM. This feature corresponded with histopathologic findings of basal layer infiltration by tumor cells with permeation of rete ridges, thus, obscuring the dermoepidermal interface. Examination of the dermis under RCM for all the MF lesions showed weakly refractile structures, but was limited by loss of detail and contrast below the dermoepidermal junction.

Limitations

Because of limited imaging depth, RCM did not visualize dermal infiltration by tumor cells in tumor-type MF. Epidermotropic lymphocytes appeared weakly refractile under RCM and were difficult to distinguish from surrounding keratinocytes as a result of minimal difference in contrast. Other limitations on RCM include some similarity in findings with spongiotic and lichenoid dermatitides, and an inability to distinguish specific cell types. Moreover, this study did not address the inherent heterogeneity of MF lesions, but was primarily focused on correlating RCM and hematoxylin-eosin histopathology of the included cases.

Conclusion

Features correlating well to histopathology are observed on RCM of MF lesions; however, the specificity of these findings needs to be assessed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations used : DEJ, MF, RCM


Plan


 Funding sources: None.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2007  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 57 - N° 3

P. 435-441 - septembre 2007 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Change of address
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Cutaneous responses to vaccinia in individuals with previous smallpox vaccination
  • Eric L. Simpson, Michelle Hercher, Erika K. Hammarlund, Matthew W. Lewis, Mark K. Slifka, Jon M. Hanifin

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.