S'abonner

Detection of melanomas in patients followed up with total cutaneous examinations, total cutaneous photography, and dermoscopy - 24/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/S0190-9622(03)02794-4 
Steven Q Wang, MD c, Alfred W Kopf, MD a, , Karen Koenig, PhD b, David Polsky, MD, PhD a, Kira Nudel, BA a, Robert S Bart, MD a
a Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA 
b Department of Environmental Medicine and Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA 
c Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA 

*Reprint requests: Alfred W. Kopf, MD, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, H164, New York, NY 10016, USA.

Abstract

Background

Many factors have been identified as important determinants that increase the risk of malignant melanoma (MM) developing. Patients with classic atypical mole syndrome (CAMS) have multiple such factors and are known to be at high risk for MMs developing.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the risk for newly diagnosed MMs developing in patients with CAMS and in a heterogeneous group of patients at high risk (ie, those with high-risk non-CAMS [HRNCAMS]) who had 1 or more risk factors: personal history of nonmelanoma skin cancers; family history of melanoma; biopsy specimen–confirmed dysplastic nevi; and meeting 1 or 2 of the 3 CAMS criteria. We also aimed to report our experience treating these patients at high risk with annual total cutaneous examination, total cutaneous photography, and dermoscopy.

Methods

Consecutive medical records from a private dermatology practice were reviewed. A total of 258 patients were selected who fulfilled the criteria of having: (1) total cutaneous photography as an aid for follow-up; (2) total cutaneous examination at least once per year; (3) at least 6 months of clinical follow-up; and (4) no personal history of melanomas. A total of 160 patients with CAMS and 98 with HRNCAMS were included in this study. The 10-year risk for MM developing in these 2 cohorts was computed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

In the CAMS cohort, 28 new MMs developed in 19 patients resulting in a cumulative 10-year risk of 14% (95% confidence interval: 7-20). In the HRNCAMS cohort, 10 new MMs developed in 9 patients, and the cumulative 10-year risk was 10% (95% confidence interval: 2-17). The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P = .91). The MMs diagnosed in both cohorts were either in situ or less than 1 mm in Breslow thickness. There were no MM metastases or MM-related deaths in either cohort during a mean follow-up period of 120 months for the CAMS and 98 months for the HRNCAMS group.

Conclusion

Both the patients with CAMS and HRNCAMS were at very high risk for MMs developing. The combination of total cutaneous photography, total cutaneous examination, and dermoscopy were used in treating our patients. No MM 1 mm or greater in thickness developed during follow-up in either group.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations : CAMS, DN, HRNCAMS, MM, TCE, TCP


Plan


 Supported by Joseph H. Hazen Foundation; Mary and Emanuel Rosenthal Foundation; Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center; the Blair O. Rogers Medical Research Fund; Rahr Family Founda-tion; and Stavrous S. Niarchos Foundation Fund of the Skin Cancer Foundation.
Conflicts of interest: None identified.


© 2004  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 50 - N° 1

P. 15-20 - janvier 2004 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • CME examination : Identification No. 804-101
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Answers to CME examination for Brecher AR, Orlow SJ. Oral retinoid therapy for dermatologic conditions in children and adolescents : (J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49:186 [August])

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.