S'abonner

The relation of autopsy rate to physicians' beliefs and recommendations regarding autopsy - 25/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.028 
Elizabeth C Burton, MD a, , Russell S Phillips, MD b, Kenneth E Covinsky, MD, MPH c, Laura P Sands, PhD d, Lee Goldman, MD e, Neal V Dawson, MD f, Alfred F Connors, MD g, C.Seth Landefeld, MD g
a Department of Pathology (ECB), Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA 
b Division of General Medicine and Primary Care (RSP), Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 
c Department of Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Fellowship Program (KEC, CSL), San Francisco VA Medical Center, California, USA 
d Division of Geriatrics (KEC, CSL), Department of Medicine (LG), and the Center on Aging (KEC, CSL), University of California, San Francisco, USA 
e Department of Nursing (LPS), Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA 
f the Center for Health Care Research and Policy and the Department of Medicine (NVD, AFC), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 
g Metro Health Medical Center (NVD, AFC), Cleveland, Ohio, USA 

*Requests for reprints should be addressed to Elizabeth C. Burton, MD, Department of Pathology, Baylor University Medical Center, Fifth Floor, Y Wing, 3500 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75246, USA

Abstract

Purpose

Multiple factors have affected the decline in autopsy rates. Our goal was to determine the relation of physicians' recommendations regarding autopsy, as well as patient and surrogate decision-maker characteristics, to autopsy performance.

Methods

We assessed measures related to autopsy performance using data from two teaching institutions in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. We included patients who had died within 6 months of their index hospitalization and for whom information was available on autopsy performance, physicians' response to questions about autopsy, and interviews with surrogate decision makers about autopsy performance. We assessed the association between autopsy performance and the strength of a physician's recommendation for autopsy, adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics.

Results

Of the 680 patients who died, 59% (n = 402) met our inclusion criteria. Based on physician and surrogate responses, the expected autopsy rate was 42% while the actual autopsy rate was 23%. The autopsy rate was higher when the physician's recommendation for autopsy was strong or very strong at the time of death compared with when autopsy was not recommended strongly or not at all (P <0.001). The strength of the physician's postmortem recommendation was independently associated with autopsy performance after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics (P <0.001).

Conclusion

Autopsies are less likely to be performed when not recommended strongly or not at all. Training physicians (or others) how to recommend autopsies may increase autopsy rates.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Dr. Burton was a Veterans Affairs National Quality Scholars Fellow at the San Francisco VA Medical Center. This work was supported in part by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the National Institute on Aging, the John A. Hartford Foundation, and Dartmouth College; and by a grant to Dartmouth College from the Pfizer Foundation.


© 2004  Elsevier Inc. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 117 - N° 4

P. 255-261 - août 2004 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Value of initial chest radiographs for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome
  • Tai-nin Chau, Po-oi Lee, Kin-wing Choi, Chiu-man Lee, Ka-fai Ma, Tak-yin Tsang, Yuk-keung Tso, Ming-chee Chiu, Wing-lok Tong, Wai-cho Yu, Sik-to Lai
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Telomere maintenance in clinical medicine
  • Gary A. Ulaner

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.