Creation and Implementation of an Emergency General Surgery Registry Modeled after the National Trauma Data Bank - 23/01/12
, J. Wayne Meredith, MD, FACS, Michael C. Chang, MD, FACS, J. Jason Hoth, MD, PhD, FACS, H. Randall Beard, MD, Preston R. Miller, MD, FACSRésumé |
Background |
As emergency general surgery (EGS) evolves, an EGS patient-tracking database (EGS registry [EGSR]) similar to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) will be essential to study outcomes and improve care. The goal of this study was to establish diagnostic ICD-9 codes to define EGS patients. The hypothesis was that creating standardized ICD-9-based inclusion criteria would facilitate patient identification for an EGSR and aid in its ongoing development.
Study Design |
We conducted a retrospective review of EGS admissions over a 9-month period to define ICD-9 diagnostic codes of patients admitted to our EGS service. Subsequently, prospective data were collected into the EGSR by testing ICD-9-based inclusion criteria over 1 month. Patient, hospital, and severity scoring variables, as well as quality assurance information, were identified.
Results |
We identified 959 admissions to the EGS service over 9 months with 306 ICD-9 diagnosis codes that define EGS patients; the prospective population of the EGSR confirmed feasibility of ICD-9-based inclusion criteria. The EGSR captures 107 data points and 33 comorbidities per patient over 11 categories, akin to the 10 NTDB categories.
Conclusions |
Following the model of the NTDB, we have successfully completed creation and initial implementation of an EGSR by using ICD-9-based inclusion criteria. Our comprehensive EGSR creates a prospective data-collection modality to capture and define EGS patients. A uniform patient-tracking EGSR, akin to the NTDB, will advance the science of acute care surgery, improve EGS patient outcomes, and facilitate multi-institutional collaboration.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Abbreviations and Acronyms : AAST, ACS, ACSCOT, EGS, EGSR, NSQIP, NTDB
Plan
| Disclosure information: Nothing to disclose. |
Vol 214 - N° 2
P. 156-163 - février 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?
