Melanoma in situ in a private practice setting 2005 through 2009: Location, lesion size, lack of concern - 11/08/12
Abstract |
Background |
Studies have shown that the incidence of melanoma in situ (MIS) is increasing significantly.
Objective |
This study analyzes selected clinical and demographic characteristics of MIS cases observed in private dermatology practices in the United States.
Methods |
This study collected 257 MIS cases from 4 private dermatology practices in the United States from January 2005 through December 2009, recording age, gender, anatomic location, lesion size, patient-reported change in lesion, and concern about lesion. Case totals for invasive melanoma during the same period were recorded.
Results |
The data collected showed a higher incidence of MIS in sun-exposed areas of older patients, especially men. The median age of patients at the time of MIS detection was 69 years. The most common site for MIS was the head-neck region. The number of MIS cases collected exceeded the number of invasive malignant melanoma cases during the study period, with an observed ratio of 1.35:1.
Limitations |
For 136 patients, data were collected retrospectively for lesion size, location, gender, and age. For these patients, patient-reported change in lesion and concern about lesion were not collected. Patients often did not consent to a full body examination, therefore, it is possible that MIS lesions may have been missed in double-clothed areas.
Conclusion |
Careful attention to pigmented lesions, even lesions less than 4 mm, on sun-exposed areas, including scalp, trunk, and feet, will facilitate earlier diagnosis of MIS. As only 30.4% of male patients and 50% of female patients had concern about these lesions, it still falls to the dermatologist to discover MIS.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : early detection, melanoma, melanoma in situ, patient concern, scalp, sun exposure, trunk
Abbreviations used : CDC, LM, MIS, MM, NIH
Plan
This publication was made possible by grant number SBIR R44 CA-101639-02A2 of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIH, the sponsor. The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 67 - N° 3
P. e105-e109 - septembre 2012 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?