S'abonner

Separating the Domains of Oppositional Behavior: Comparing Latent Models of the Conners’ Oppositional Subscale - 26/01/13

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.10.005 
Ana V. Kuny, Ph.D. a, b, Robert R. Althoff, M.D., Ph.D. a, , William Copeland, Ph.D. d, Meike Bartels, Ph.D. e, C.E.M. Van Beijsterveldt, Ph.D. e, Julie Baer, Ph.D. a, c, James J. Hudziak, M.D a, e, f
a Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families at the University of Vermont 
b New Mexico Veterans Administration Hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico 
c Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio 
d Duke University 
e Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands 
f Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 

Correspondence to Robert Althoff, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Psychiatry, 364 SJ3 FAHC, 1 S. Prospect, Burlington VT 05401

Résumé

Objective

Although oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is usually considered the mildest of the disruptive behavior disorders, it is a key factor in predicting young adult anxiety and depression and is distinguishable from normal childhood behavior. In an effort to understand possible subsets of oppositional defiant behavior (ODB) that may differentially predict outcome, we used latent class analysis of mother report on the Conners’ Parent Rating Scales Revised Short Forms (CPRS-R:S).

Method

Data were obtained from mother report for Dutch twins (7 years old, n = 7,597; 10 years old, n = 6,548; and 12 years old, n = 5,717) from the Netherlands Twin Registry. Samples partially overlapped at ages 7 and 10 years (19% overlapping) and at ages 10 and 12 years (30% overlapping), but not at ages 7 and 12 years. Oppositional defiant behavior was measured using the six-item Oppositional subscale of the CPRS-R:S. Multilevel LCA with robust standard error estimates was performed using the Latent Gold program to control for twin–twin dependence in the data. Class assignment across ages was determined and an estimate of heritability for each class was calculated. Comparisons with maternal report Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) scores were examined using linear mixed models at each age, corrected for multiple comparisons.

Results

The LCA identified an optimal solution of four classes across age groups. Class 1 was associated with no or low symptom endorsement (69–75% of the children); class 2 was characterized by defiance (11–12%); class 3 was characterized by irritability (9–11%); and class 4 was associated with elevated scores on all symptoms (5–8%). Odds ratios for twins being in the same class at each successive age point were higher within classes across ages than between classes. Heritability within the two “intermediate” classes was nearly as high as for the class with all symptoms, except for boys at age 12. Children in the Irritable class were more likely to have mood symptoms on the CBCL scales than children in the Defiant class but demonstrated similar scores on aggression and externalizing scales. Children in the All Symptoms class were higher in both internalizing and externalizing scales and subscales.

Conclusions

The LCA indicates four distinct latent classes of oppositional defiant behavior, in which the distinguishing feature between the two intermediate classes (classes 2 and 3) is the level of irritability and defiance. Implications for the longitudinal course of these symptoms, association with other disorders, and genetics are discussed.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key Words : oppositional defiant disorder, twin, latent class analysis


Plan


 Supplemental material cited in this article is available online.
 This article was reviewed under and accepted by ad hoc editor, Daniel S. Pine, M.D.
 Drs. Kuny and Althoff contributed equally to this article.
 Drs. Kuny, Althoff, Baer and Hudziak are with the Vermont Center for Children, Youth, and Families at the University of Vermont. Dr. Kuny is also with the New Mexico Veterans Administration Hospital in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Dr. Baer is also with the Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. Dr. Copeland is with Duke University. Drs. Bartel, Van Beijsterveldt, and Hudziak are with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Dr. Hudziak is also with Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
 This work was supported by National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grants MH082116 and MH58799, and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research grants 575-25-006, 575-25-012, and 904-57-94.
 The authors thank Dorret Boomsma of Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands, for allowing the use of Netherlands Twin Registry data.
 Disclosure: Dr. Althoff has received grant or research support from NIMH and the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation. Dr. Copeland has received grant or research support from NIMH and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation. Dr. Bartels has received funding from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK). Dr. Hudziak has received funding from NIMH and NIDDK. His primary appointment is with the University of Vermont. He has additional appointments with Erasmus University in Rotterdam, Vrije University in Amsterdam, Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire, and the Avera Institute of Human Behavioral Genetics in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Drs. Van Beijesterveldt, Kuny, and Baer report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.


© 2013  American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 52 - N° 2

P. 172 - février 2013 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Emotion Regulation and Heterogeneity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Erica D. Musser, Hilary S. Galloway-Long, Paul J. Frick, Joel T. Nigg
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Gray Matter Volume in Adolescent Anxiety: An Impact of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met Polymorphism?
  • Sven C. Mueller, Aveline Aouidad, Elena Gorodetsky, David Goldman, Daniel S. Pine, Monique Ernst

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Elsevier s'engage à rendre ses eBooks accessibles et à se conformer aux lois applicables. Compte tenu de notre vaste bibliothèque de titres, il existe des cas où rendre un livre électronique entièrement accessible présente des défis uniques et l'inclusion de fonctionnalités complètes pourrait transformer sa nature au point de ne plus servir son objectif principal ou d'entraîner un fardeau disproportionné pour l'éditeur. Par conséquent, l'accessibilité de cet eBook peut être limitée. Voir plus

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2026 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.