S'abonner

Preoperative imaging prior to breast reconstruction surgery: Benchmarking bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons. Proposed guidelines - 05/04/14

Doi : 10.1016/j.anplas.2013.07.010 
R. Carloni a, E. Delay b, A. Gourari a, b, , C. Ho Quoc b, C. Tourasse c, C. Balleyguier d, N. Forme a, D. Goga a
a Plastic and reconstructive surgery unit, CHRU de Tours, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-les-Tours, France 
b Plastic and reconstructive surgery, centre régional Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France 
c Hôpital privé Jean-Mermoz, 55, avenue Jean-Mermoz, 69008 Lyon, France 
d Imaging unit, institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France 

Corresponding author. Plastic and reconstructive surgery unit, CHRU de Tours, avenue de la République, 37170 Chambray-les-Tours, France.

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
Article gratuit.

Connectez-vous pour en bénéficier!

Summary

Background

Prescription of preoperatory imaging assessment prior to planned breast reconstruction surgery (reduction or augmentation mastoplasty, correction of congenital breast asymmetry) is poorly codified. The objective of this study was to analyze the attitudes of French radiologists and plastic surgeons with regard to prescription of preoperative imaging in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery.

Material and methods

This is a descriptive and comparative observational study involving two groups, one consisting of 50 plastic surgeons (P) and the other of 50 radiologists (R) specialized in breast imaging. A questionnaire was handed out to radiologists during a conference on breast imaging at the Institut Gustave-Roussy in Paris (France) held on 17th December 2012. The same questionnaire was handed out to plastic surgeons at the National Congress of the French Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (SOFCPRE) held on 19th, 20th and 21st November 2012, also in Paris (France). The questionnaire focused on prescription of preoperative and postoperative imaging evaluation for non-oncologic breast surgery in patients with no risk factors for breast cancer or clinically identified indications.

Results

Forty-six percent of the plastic surgeons considered an imaging exam to be recent when it had been carried out over the previous 6 months, while 40% of the radiologists set the figure at 1 year. Clinical breast density exerted no influence on 92% of the plastic surgeons and 98% of the radiologists. A majority of the plastic surgeons would prescribe a preoperative exam regardless of age (57% for breast reduction, 61% for breast implant placement and 61% for surgical correction of asymmetry) while the radiologists would prescribe exams mainly for patients over 40 years (50% for reduction, 44% for augmentation, 49% for asymmetry correction). The plastic surgeons would prescribe either ultrasound or mammograms (59% for reduction, 72% for augmentation, 66% for asymmetry correction) while radiologists would usually prescribe mammograms (64%, 57%, 64%). Most of the radiologists, along with the plastic surgeons, did not think that postoperative examination is justified (58% of P and 62% of R for reduction, 56% P and 68% of R for augmentation, 52% of P and 64% of R for asymmetry correction).

Conclusion

In 2012, there existed no French consensus on prescription of a preoperative imaging assessment in the framework of non-oncologic breast surgery in patients without risk factors for breast cancer. Active cooperation bringing together radiologists and plastic surgeons is likely to facilitate the harmonizing of their respective practices. In this paper, we propose guidelines that could help them to synchronize their efforts.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Keywords : Breast imaging, Preoperative, Radiologists, Plastic surgeons, Mammography, Ultrasound


Plan


© 2014  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 59 - N° 2

P. e13-e19 - avril 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • The latest information on Macrolane™: Its indications and restrictions
  • T. Siebert, B. Chaput, C. Vaysse, T. Meresse, J.-P. Chavoin, I. Garrido, J.-L. Grolleau
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Incidence of occult contralateral carcinomas of the breast following mastoplasty aimed at symmetrization
  • T. Sorin, J.-P. Fyad, J. Pujo, T. Colson, V. Bordes, A. Leroux, F. Marchal, M. Brix, E. Simon, J.-L. Verhaeghe, J.-M. Classe, G. Dolivet

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.