S'abonner

P29: Oesophageal and gastric obstruction in a cocaine body packer - 28/06/14

Doi : 10.1016/S2352-0078(14)70090-3 
P. Hantson 1, 2, A. Capron 2, J.-F. Maillart 3
1 Department of intensive care 
2 Louvain centre for toxicology and applied pharmacology 
3 Department of abdominal surgery, cliniques St-Luc, université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium 

Résumé

Introduction.

Body packing may expose the patient to a significant number of complications, including acute poisoning after rupture of the packages, or more exceptionally, intestinal obstruction. Most of the patients can be managed conservatively by oral laxatives. However, surgical intervention has been recommended in cases of package retention beyond 5-7 days to prevent package leakage, rupture and obstruction. We report a recent case of oesophageal and gastric obstruction caused by a large number of cocaine-containing packages.

Case observation.

A 49-year-old previously healthy woman originated from East Africa was found stuporous at the railway station of the airport. Her consciousness rapidly deteriorated before the arrival of the first medical rescuers. She was then found with a Glasgow Coma Score of 3/15, bradypnea 4/min, heart rate 60/min, arterial blood pressure 140/90mm Hg and oxygen saturation (SpO2) 91%. Pinpoint pupils were also remarkable. Orotracheal intubation was performed. The diagnosis of opioid poisoning was supported by the clinical response to a single i.v. dose of 0,4mg naloxone. Soon after the admission in the Emergency Department, an abdomen computed tomography (CT) was obtained due to the high suspicion of body packing. It confirmed the presence of multiple packs: 81 in the dilated stomach, 1 in the lower part of the oesophagus and 8 in the sigmoid and rectum. Toxicological analysis revealed: serum morphine 0,73μg/ml, codeine 0,06μg/ml; urine benzoylecgonine 0,015μg/ml, 6-MAM 0,351μg/ml, codeine 17,6μg/ml. As the patient did not present any clinical sign of acute cocaine toxicity, a conservative approach was proposed by whole bowel irrigation (polyethylene glycol). The patient only complained from abdominal discomfort. Extubation was not possible due to persisting opiod syndrome. (The patient admitted later on having ingested morphine and codeine to decrease intestinal peristaltism). On hospital day 4, the patient became mildly tachycardic and hypertensive, and abdominal discomfort worsened. There was no significant increase in urine benzoylecgonone concentration. A new abdomen CT showed no significant progression of the packages; 9 had been removed after laxative therapy. The stomach appeared extremely dilated. A surgical procedure was decided (gastrotomy). On the whole, one pack was removed from the lower oesophagus, 79 from the stomach, and three additional packages were evacuated after palpation of the colon. The post-operative course was not complicated and extubation was possible 48 hours later. The abdomen CT confirmed the complete evacuation.

Discussion.

The exact incidence of intestinal obstruction following body packing is not known, but is probably reaching 5%. The main risk is the rupture of the packages with acute cocaine intoxication. Emergency laparotomy is the only therapeutic option when the patient is becoming symptomatic. In the present observation, conservative therapy failed due the presence of a large amount of packages that had accumulated in the stomach. This high number of packages did not allow removal by endoscopy. The literature data show that surgery is mainly indicated when the packages are located in the stomach or in the small bowel.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

© 2014  Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 26 - N° 2S

P. S43 - juin 2014 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • P28: Intérêt du suivi toxicocinétique : à propos de 5 cas d’intoxications aiguës médicamenteuses
  • G. Deslandes, C. Monteil-Ganiere, R. Bouquie, E. Dailly, D. Boels, C. Renaud, C. Azoulay, A. Pineau, M. Gregoire, H. Grison-Hernando, D. Villers, P. Jolliet
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • P30: Acute heart failure after venlafaxine overdose: Post-mortem myocardial examination in two cases
  • M. Batista, S. Fonseca, J.-P. Cosyns, V. Haufroid, A. Capron, P. Hantson

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.