Strategies used for measuring long-term control in atopic dermatitis trials: A systematic review - 15/10/16
Abstract |
Background |
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. There are no standardized methods for capturing long-term control of AD.
Objective |
We sought to identify how long-term control has been captured in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results will initiate consensus discussions on how best to measure long-term control in the core outcome set for AD.
Methods |
We conducted a systematic review of RCTs of AD treatments published between 2000 and 2013, with a follow-up period of 3 months or longer, at least 1 outcome measure recorded at 3 or more time points, full article available, and published in English.
Results |
In all, 101 of 353 RCTs were eligible. Methods to capture long-term control included: repeated measurement of AD outcomes (92 RCTs; 91%), use of AD medication (29 RCTs; 28.7%), and AD flares/remissions (26 RCTs; 25.7%). Repeated measurements of AD outcomes were typically collected 3 to 5 times during a trial, but analysis methods often failed to make best use of the data. Time to first flare was most commonly used for trials including flare data (21/52). Medication use was recorded based on quantity, potency, and frequency of application.
Limitations |
We included RCT data only.
Conclusion |
This review illustrates the difficulties in measuring long-term control, and points to the need for improved harmonization of outcomes.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Graphical abstract |
Key words : atopic dermatitis, atopic eczema, flares, long-term control, outcome measures, randomized controlled trials, systematic review
Abbreviations used : AD, GREAT, HOME, IGA, RCT
Plan
Dr Ridd is funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Post Doctoral Fellowship (PDF-2014-07-013). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. |
|
Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 75 - N° 5
P. 1038-1044 - novembre 2016 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?