Article

Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 14, n° 5P1
pages 748-753 (mai 1986)
Doi : 10.1016/S0190-9622(86)70088-1
accepted : 18 December 1985
Polymorphous light eruption: Action spectrum and photoprotection
 

Bernhard Ortel, M.D., Adrian Tanew, M.D., Klaus Wolff, M.D., Herbert Hönigsmann, M.D.
Division of Photobiology, Department of Dermatology (I), University of Vienna. 

aReprint requests to: Dr. Herbert Hönigsmann, Division of Photobiology, Department of Dermatology (I), University of Vienna, Alser Strasse 4, A-1090 Vienna, Austria/222-430-866.
@@#100979@@

Polymorphous light eruption is a common seasonal photodermatosis with a typical history and clinical picture. In the interval, when no lesions are present, the diagnosis relies on artificial reproduction of polymorphous light eruption by phototesting. Photochemotherapy (psoralens with ultraviolet A [PUVA]) is currently an effective preventive treatment. One hundred sixty-seven patients with either a history of polymorphous light eruption or manifest disease entered our study. Of 142 patients tested, 49% developed typical lesions of polymorphous light eruption at the test sites. In 56% the action spectrum was found to be in the ultraviolet A range, in 17% in the ultraviolet B range, and in 26% in both ranges. A total of 122 patients received preventive treatment with PUVA. Of these, fifty-one returned for follow-up. Of the patients who were followed up, 64% reported total protection during outdoor activities in the summer, 26% reported partial protection, and 10% were not protected. Failure to improve was unrelated to the action spectrum. The action spectrum and the incidence of positive results on phototests in our patient population differed from those reported by others. It is possible that differences in the test protocols and in the light sources used may account for this discrepancy. There is clearly a need for a standardized test procedure. However, the majority of patients benefit from PUVA pretreatment regardless of their action spectrum.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Top of the page

© 1986  Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline
You can move this window by clicking on the headline
@@#110903@@