Microsurgical repair of the facial nerve - 10/03/08
R. Donzelli [1],
F. Maiuri [1],
C. Peca [1],
L.M. Cavallo [1],
G. Motta [2],
E. de Divitiis [1]
Voir les affiliationsObjective. To report a series of 18 patients who underwent microsurgical repair of the facial nerve using different techniques and to discuss the indications and results of facial reinnervation procedures.
Methods. Eighteen patients with post-surgical facial palsy underwent facial reinnervation using different techniques. These included classic hypoglossal-facial anastomosis in 13 cases, one-stage hemihypoglossal-intratemporal facial nerve anastomosis and translabyrinthine removal of residual intracanalar acoustic schwannoma in 3, hemihypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis in one, and neurotization of facial muscles through a nerve graft in one.
Results. The facial muscle function improved in all patients, up to grade III in 7 cases (39%), grade IV in 9 (50%) and grade V in 2 (11%). The tongue atrophy was minimal in 70.5%, moderate in 17.5% and severe in 12%. The outcome was better in younger patients (less than 40 years of age) and in those with a lesser grade of preoperative facial impairment.
Conclusions. The classic hypoglossal-facial anastomosis is the technique of choice in most cases. The use of the intratemporal facial nerve is indicated when removal of an intracanalar residual schwannoma must also be performed. The neurotization of the facial muscles through a nerve graft may be used when there is no distal trunk of the facial nerve avaible for the anastomosis.
Keywords:
Hypoglossal-facial anastomosis
,
facial palsy
,
acoustic schwannoma
,
facial nerve
Plan
© 2006 Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Vol 52 - N° 1
P. 69-70 - février 2006 Retour au numéroBienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?