S'abonner

An assessment of the use of antihistamines in the management of atopic dermatitis - 18/06/18

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.077 
Alice He, MD a, Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD a, b, c, , Alan B. Fleischer, MD d
a Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 
b Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 
c Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 
d Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 

Correspondence to: Steven R. Feldman, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1071.Department of DermatologyWake Forest School of MedicineMedical Center BoulevardWinston-SalemNC27157-1071

Abstract

Background

Antihistamines are often used to treat pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) despite lack of evidence for their efficacy. The American Academy of Dermatology does not recommend the general use of antihistamines in the management of AD, although the value of short-term sedating antihistamine use for insomnia secondary to itch is recognized.

Objective

To assess the use of sedating and nonsedating antihistamines for AD in 2003-2012.

Methods

The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey provided data on physician visits in 2003-2012. Sedating and nonsedating antihistamine use was identified at visits for AD.

Results

There were 990,000 annual visits for AD. Antihistamines were prescribed for AD in a significant proportion of visits across physician specialties (16%-44%). Dermatologists and pediatricians primarily used sedating antihistamines (58%-70%), whereas the majority of family/general practitioners, internists, and other specialists prescribed nonsedating antihistamines for AD (55%-100%)

Limitations

We were limited by the accuracy of AD diagnosis and medication recording.

Conclusions

Antihistamines are widely used for the treatment of AD. There is no high-level evidence to suggest that nonsedating antihistamines reduce itch in patients with AD or that sedating antihistamines provide benefit in controlling AD symptoms (except perhaps sleep and AD comorbidities, such as allergic rhinitis).

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Key words : antihistamines, atopic dermatitis, guidelines, itch, treatments, trends

Abbreviations used : AAD, AD, NAMCS


Plan


 Funding sources: Supported by a grant from Regeneron.
 Disclosure: The Center for Dermatology Research is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Galderma Laboratories, LP. Dr Feldman is a speaker for Janssen and Taro; he has received research, speaking and/or consulting support from a variety of companies including Galderma, GSK/Stiefel, Almirall, Leo Pharma, Baxter, Boeringer Ingelheim, Mylan, Celgene, Pfizer, Valeant, Abbvie, Cosmederm, Anacor, Astellas, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Merz, Novartis, Qurient, National Biological Corporation, Caremark, Advance Medical, Suncare Research, Informa, UpToDate and National Psoriasis Foundation; and he is the founder and majority owner of www.DrScore.com and the founder and part owner of Causa Research, a company dedicated to enhancing patients' adherence to treatment. Dr Fleischer is a consultant for Kikaku America International and Exeltis; he was an Investigator for Abbvie, Galderma, Regeneron, and Eli Lilly and an employee of Merz. Dr Fleischer is currently an employee of Abbvie. Dr He disclosed no conflicts.


© 2018  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 79 - N° 1

P. 92-96 - juillet 2018 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancers and impact of immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients
  • Pamela Funk-Debleds, Emilie Ducroux, Olivier Guillaud, José Ursic-Bedoya, Evelyne Decullier, Mélanie Vallin, Sylvie Euvrard, Georges-Philippe Pageaux, Olivier Boillot, Jérôme Dumortier
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • A prospective study comparing patients with early and late relapsing pemphigus treated with rituximab
  • Marwah Adly Saleh

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.