1 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates


Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research
Sous presse. Epreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le lundi 17 septembre 2018
Doi : 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.007
Received : 23 December 2017 ;  accepted : 11 June 2018
Transtendinous repair of partial articular sided supraspinatus tears is associated with higher rates of stiffness and significantly inferior early functional scores than tear completion and repair: A systematic review

Robert W. Jordan a, , Kieran Bentick b, Adnan Saithna c, d
a University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, CV2 2DX Coventry, United Kingdom 
b University Hospitals North Midlands, ST46QG Stoke, United Kingdom 
c Medical Technologies and Advanced Materials, Clifton Campus, Nottingham Trent University, NG11 8NS Nottingham, United Kingdom 
d Renacres Hospital, Renacres Lane, Ormskirk, Lancashire, Halsall, L39 8SE Ormskirk, United Kingdom 

Corresponding author.

Transtendon repair (TTR) and tear completion and repair (TCR) are common repair techniques for partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs). Previous systematic reviews have not demonstrated any advantage of either but have not specifically addressed early recovery.


To compare the outcomes of these two techniques in treating PTRCTs with respect to post-operative stiffness, delay in functional recovery and re-tear rates.

Material and methods

A systematic review of the Medline and EMBASE database was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Both cases series and comparative studies reporting functional outcomes, post-operative stiffness or re-tear rate after either TTR or TCR for PTRCTs were included.


The search strategy identified 21 studies (n =797); 4 comparative studies (n =214), 15 TTR (n =511) and 2 TCR case series (n =72). All four comparative studies included were randomised controlled trials. One RCT reported early outcomes and demonstrated significantly slower recovery in the TTR group at 3 months (ASES p =0.037, Constant score p =0.019 and pain p =0.001). Similarly, data from the case series suggested that the rate of post-operative stiffness was higher in the TTR group. All comparative studies demonstrated no significant difference at final follow up in terms of pain, range of motion or functional score.


The results of this systematic review suggest that transtendinous repairs are associated with more pain and worse function during the first 3 months. This suggests that tear completion and repair should be the preferred option, as comparative studies do not demonstrate any long-term advantage of transtendinous repair.

Level of evidence

II, systematic review.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Keywords : Rotator cuff tear, Tear completion, Transtendinous repair, Partial rotator cuff tear, Stiffness

© 2018  Elsevier Masson SAS. All Rights Reserved.
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Article Outline