Article

2 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



@@#116300@@

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Sous presse. Epreuves corrigées par l'auteur. Disponible en ligne depuis le jeudi 7 novembre 2019
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.011
accepted : 8 July 2019
Histopathologic features distinguishing secondary syphilis from its mimickers
 

Alexandra Flamm, MD a, , Veronica Merelo Alcocer, MD a, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya, MD, PhD b, Eun Ji Kwon, MD c, Dirk Elston, MD d
a Department of Pathology and Dermatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 
b Department of Dermatology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 
c Dermpath Diagnostics New York, Port Chester, New York 
d Department of Dermatology, University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 

Reprint requests: Alexandra Flamm, MD, Department of Dermatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Mail Code HU14, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033.Department of DermatologyPenn State Hershey Medical CenterMail Code HU14, 500 University DrHersheyPA17033
Abstract
Background

Syphilis is often misdiagnosed clinically, and biopsies might be required.

Objective

To determine histopathologic features that distinguish secondary syphilis from pityriasis lichenoides (PL), pityriasis rosea (PR), and early mycosis fungoides (MF).

Methods

Histopathologic features of 100 cases of syphilis, 110 cases of PL, 72 cases of PR, and 101 cases of MF were compared.

Results

Elongated rete ridges and interstitial inflammation favor syphilis over PL (likelihood ratios 3.44 and 2.72, respectively), but no feature reliably distinguishes between them. Secondary syphilis and PR can be distinguished by neutrophils in the stratum corneum, plasma cells, interface dermatitis with lymphocytes and vacuoles, and lymphocytes with ample cytoplasm. Plasma cells and lymphocytes with ample cytoplasm are rare in early MF and can be used as distinguishing features.

Conclusions

Histopathologic features characteristic of syphilis can be seen in PL, PR, and early MF. Distinguishing syphilis from PL can be difficult histologically, and a high index of suspicion is required. Although elongation of rete and interstitial inflammation favor syphilis, plasma cells (historically considered a significant feature of syphilis) are often encountered in PL. Vacuolar interface dermatitis with a lymphocyte in every vacuole is considered characteristic of PL, but this feature appears to be more common in syphilis.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

Key words : dermatopathology, mycosis fungoides, pityriasis lichenoides, pityriasis rosea, secondary syphilis, syphilis

Abbreviations used : LR, MF, PL, PR



 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None disclosed.



© 2019  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline
You can move this window by clicking on the headline