S'abonner

A relative value unit–based cost comparison of treatment modalities for nonmelanoma skin cancer: Effect of the loss of the Mohs multiple surgery reduction exemption - 07/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.047 
Howard W. Rogers, MD, PhD a, , Brett M. Coldiron, MD b
a The Skin Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 
b Department of Dermatology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 

Reprint requests: Howard W. Rogers, MD, PhD, The Skin Cancer Center, 3024 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45219.

Abstract

Background

The incidence of skin cancer has increased dramatically, with as many as 2.8 million skin cancers treated in 2005. In an era of decreasing reimbursement, insurer policy changes, and increasing pressure to deliver cost effective care, physicians should understand the total cost of different skin cancer treatment modalities in order to determine which yields the best value for patients.

Objective

To estimate the costs of treating nonmelanoma skin cancers by multiple modalities based on their assigned relative value unit (RVU) values.

Methods

The cost analysis was performed for the treatment of two skin cancer examples, a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on the central cheek and a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on the forearm of varying sizes. The estimated costs of treatment of each of the skin cancers was calculated for treatment with electrodessication and curettage (EDC), imiquimod immunotherapy, Mohs micrographic surgery, traditional surgical excision with permanent section margin evaluation in an office setting (with immediate repair or with repair delayed until clear margins are confirmed), surgical excision with frozen section margin control in both an ambulatory surgery center and hospital-based setting, and radiation therapy. The effect of the loss of exemption from multiple surgery reduction on the cost of Mohs surgery is also examined.

Results

Our estimation of costs for each of the treatment modalities reveals that EDC is the least expensive option, with average costs of $471 (BCC cheek) and $392 (SCC arm). Imiquimod treatment and office-based excision with immediate repair of the surgical defect have similar total average costs of $959 (BCC cheek) and $931 (SCC arm) and $1006 (BCC cheek) and $907 (SCC arm), respectively. If repair of the defect is delayed until negative surgical margins are confirmed by permanent section, the cost of excision increases to $1170 and $1041. The average cost of Mohs micrographic surgery is $1263 (BCC cheek) and $1131 (SCC arm). Mohs surgery’s recent loss of multiple surgery reduction exemption has decreased the cost of Mohs surgery by 9% to 25%. Excision with frozen section margin control in an ambulatory surgery center results in costs of $2334 (BCC cheek) and $2200 (SCC arm). However, if the excision is performed in a hospital operating room, the procedure is substantially more expensive, at $3085 and $2680. The cost of radiation therapy treatment is $2591 to $3460 for the BCC of the cheek and $2559 to $3431 for the SCC of the arm, depending on the fractional dose used.

Limitations

These are cost estimates based on literature examples and 2008 RVU values; variations related to individual practices and procedure valuations by private insurers are expected.

Conclusion

Tumor destruction by EDC or imiquimod and office-based procedures, such as traditional surgical excision or Mohs surgery, are the lowest cost options for treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 Funding sources: None.
 Conflicts of interest: None declared.


© 2008  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 61 - N° 1

P. 96-103 - juillet 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Streptococcal vulvovaginitis
  • Warren R. Heymann
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Lichen planus–like eruptions: An emerging side effect of tumor necrosis factor-⍺ antagonists
  • Adam Asarch, Alice B. Gottlieb, Jin Lee, Katherine S. Masterpol, Pamela L. Scheinman, Miguel J. Stadecker, Elena M. Massarotti, Michelle L. Bush

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.