S'abonner

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis - 08/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.008 
Lawrence Anderson, MD, FACP a, , George J. Schmieder, DO b, W. Philip Werschler, MD c, Eduardo H. Tschen, MD d, Mark R. Ling, MD, PhD e, Dow B. Stough, MD f, Janelle Katsamas g
a Dermatology Associates of Tyler, Tyler, Texas 
b Park Avenue Dermatology, PA, Orange Park, Florida 
c Premier Clinical Research, Spokane, Washington 
d Academic Dermatology Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico 
e MedaPhase, Inc., Newnan, Georgia 
f Burk Pharmaceutical Research, Hot Springs, Arkansas 
g Peplin Ltd, Brisbane, Australia 

Reprint requests: Lawrence Anderson, MD, FACP, 1367 Dominion Plaza, Tyler, TX 75703.

Abstract

Background

There is a need for improved medical approaches to the treatment of actinic keratosis. Ingenol mebutate, a diterpene ester extracted and purified from the plant Euphorbia peplus, is being evaluated as a topical therapy for actinic keratosis.

Objective

Assess the efficacy and safety of ingenol mebutate (formerly PEP005) gel at 3 dosing regimens for the treatment of actinic keratosis.

Methods

Patients with non-facial actinic keratoses applied vehicle gel for 3 days, ingenol mebutate gel, 0.025% for 3 days, or ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% for 2 or 3 days, with an 8-week follow-up period.

Results

All 3 active treatments were significantly more effective than vehicle at clearing actinic keratosis lesions, with a dose response observed. The partial clearance rate (primary efficacy end point) for patients treated with ingenol mebutate gel ranged from 56.0% to 75.4% compared with 21.7% for vehicle gel (P = .0002 to P < .0001 vs vehicle). The complete clearance rate was also significantly higher (P ≤ .0006) for patients in the ingenol mebutate gel treatment groups (range: 40.0% to 54.4%) compared with vehicle (11.7%), as was the baseline clearance rate (range: 42.0% to 57.9% for ingenol mebutate gel compared with 13.3% for vehicle, P < .0001 to .0007 vs vehicle). The median percentage reduction in baseline actinic keratosis lesions for patients treated with ingenol mebutate gel ranged from 75% to 100% compared with 0% for vehicle gel (P < .0001 vs vehicle). Active treatment was well tolerated at all dosages. The mechanism of action of this agent is the localized induction of necrosis followed by a transient inflammatory response, and this was manifested in most patients as transient local skin responses consisting primarily of erythema, flaking/scaling, and crusting. There was no evidence of treatment-related scarring.

Limitations

Local skin responses may have suggested active treatment to investigators.

Conclusions

Short-course, field-directed therapy with ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratoses on non-facial sites seems to be effective with a favorable safety profile and potential benefits over topical agents that require a more prolonged course of treatment.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Abbreviations used : AE, AK, 5-FU, GSR, LSR, SCC


Plan


 Funding sources: Peplin Ltd, for Clinical Research and as a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee.
 Disclosure: Dr Anderson was a clinical investigator, chairs a dose escalation committee on an unrelated clinical trial, and serves on an advisory board for Peplin Ltd. Ms Katsamas is an employee of Peplin Ltd. Dr Ling received a research grant for clinical studies from Graceway and Actavis. Dr Schmieder served as an investigator for Peplin, Genentech, Novum, and Astellas. Dr Werschler has served as an investigator for Peplin, Graceway, and Valent/ICN and as an investigator, speaker, consultant, and on an advisory board for Dermik. Drs Stough and Tschen report no conflicts of interest.
 A list of all clinical investigators participating in the study is found at the end of the article.


© 2009  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 60 - N° 6

P. 934-943 - juin 2009 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer in a cohort of patients with vitiligo
  • Camile L. Hexsel, Melody J. Eide, Christine C. Johnson, Richard Krajenta, Gordon Jacobsen, Iltefat Hamzavi, Henry W. Lim
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • The relative ease of obtaining a dermatologic appointment in Boston: How methods drive results
  • David Howard Weingold, Michael Dweight Lack, Karen Leslie Yanowitz

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.