To ablate or not: A proposal regarding nomenclature - 10/08/11
, Jeffrey S. Dover, MD, FRCPC, FRCP b, c, d, Kenneth A. Arndt, MD b, c, d, e
Reprint requests: Murad Alam, MD, MSCI, Dept of Dermatology, 676 N St Clair St, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611.Abstract |
Background |
Vague and inexact word usage can complicate conversations about cutaneous energy devices, especially novel technologies.
Objective |
To identify some areas in which descriptions of lasers, lights, and energy devices can be improved.
Methods |
Ambiguities in descriptions of energy devices are addressed by suggesting sets of modifiers that are precise, accurate, simple, and mutually exclusive.
Results |
Terms are proposed for distinguishing between devices that induce skin injuries of different depths. Additionally, descriptors are suggested for fractional treatments, fat melting, and cellulite reduction. Finally, we propose a scheme for clearly naming the underlying technology associated with any cutaneous energy device.
Limitations |
Novel devices yet to be invented may not fit into the designations proposed and may require additional categories.
Conclusions |
Simple changes in word usage may facilitate rapid and accurate communication regarding lasers, lights, and other energy devices.
Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.Key words : ablative, cellulite, energy, fat, fractional, laser, light, nonablative, radiofrequency, ultrasound
Plan
| Funding sources: None |
|
| Conflicts of interest: None declared. |
Vol 64 - N° 6
P. 1170-1174 - juin 2011 Retour au numéro
Article précédent
- Change of Address
- Homocysteine may accelerate skin aging: A new chapter in the biology of skin senescence?
- Mohammad R. Namazi, Amir Feily
Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.
Déjà abonné à cette revue ?