Article

1 Iconography
Access to the text (HTML) Access to the text (HTML)
PDF Access to the PDF text
Advertising


Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription.
  • If you are a subscriber, please sign in 'My Account' at the top right of the screen.

  • If you want to subscribe to this journal, see our rates



Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume 57, n° 3
pages 445-453 (septembre 2007)
Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.02.006
Dermatologic Surgery

Prospective study of long-term patient perceptions of their skin cancer surgery
 

Anthony J. Dixon, MBBS, FACRRM, FACSCM a, , Mary P. Dixon, B Appl Sci (Nursing) b, John B. Dixon, MBBS, FRACGP, PhD c
a From the Skin Alert Skin Cancer Clinics, Belmont 
b Skincanceronly, Geelong 
c CORE, Monash University, Melbourne 

Reprint requests: Anthony J. Dixon, MBBS, FACRRM, FACSCM, 66 Roslyn Rd, Belmont 3216, Australia.

Belmont, Geelong, and Melbourne, Australia

Abstract
Background

We identified factors that influence patient perceptions of their skin cancer surgery through a prospective study of patients referred to a single surgeon during 18 months.

Method

Patients having surgery resulting in a wound sutured and dressed were surveyed 6 to 9 months later. Monitoring for complaints continued for 3 years.

Results

In all, 74% of patients returned the survey (576 of 778). A total of 250 (43%) rated their scar excellent, 177 (31%) very good, 72 (12.5%) good, 40 fair (6.9%), and 14 (2.4%) poor or very poor. Age, sex, diagnosis, or closure method did not result in a variation in scar perception. In all, 27.3% of scars (21/77) on the trunk were rated neutral or negative compared with 6.9% (33/476) of scars elsewhere (P < .001) and only 5% (15/305) of head and neck scars (P < .001). Complications did not change scar or overall evaluation ratings. In all, 393 patients (68%) rated the overall service excellent, 145 (25%) very good, 22 (4%) good, and 3 (0.5%) fair. No patient rated the service poor or very poor. Patients rating the service lower were most dissatisfied with scar appearance, time waiting before surgery, pain from the local anesthetic, nursing care, follow-up care, cost, and written material. In all, 99% of patients who rated their scar very good or excellent rated the overall service optimally, compared with only 85% of patients who rated their scar as good or worse.

Limitations

A single experienced surgeon in a southern Australia locale might not reflect the perceptions in other clinicians and locations.

Conclusion

Complications and patient complaints do not identify patient dissatisfaction from cutaneous surgery. The patients’ perception of their scars markedly influences their overall service perception. Patients experienced more dissatisfaction with repairs on the trunk.

The full text of this article is available in PDF format.

 Funding sources: None.
Conflicts of interest: None declared.



© 2007  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.@@#104156@@
EM-CONSULTE.COM is registrered at the CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.
As per the Law relating to information storage and personal integrity, you have the right to oppose (art 26 of that law), access (art 34 of that law) and rectify (art 36 of that law) your personal data. You may thus request that your data, should it be inaccurate, incomplete, unclear, outdated, not be used or stored, be corrected, clarified, updated or deleted.
Personal information regarding our website's visitors, including their identity, is confidential.
The owners of this website hereby guarantee to respect the legal confidentiality conditions, applicable in France, and not to disclose this data to third parties.
Close
Article Outline