S'abonner

Pulse versus continuous terbinafine for onychomycosis: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial - 21/08/11

Doi : 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.055 
Erin M. Warshaw, MD, MS a, b, c, , Debra D. Fett, MD e, Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH a, b, d, Joseph P. Grill, MS a, b, David B. Nelson, PhD a, b, Vicente Quintero, MD f, Susan M. Carver, RN b, Gary R. Zielke, BS b, Frank A. Lederle, MD a, b, d
a From the Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research 
b Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center 
c Departments of Dermatology 
d Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota 
e Private practices in Palm Harbor, Florida 
f New Braunfels, Texas 

Correspondence to: Erin M. Warshaw, MD, Dept 111 K VAMC, Dermatology, 1 Veterans Dr, Minneapolis, MN 55417.

Minneapolis, Minnesota; Palm Harbor, Florida; and New Braunfels, Texas

Abstract

Background

Effective treatments for onychomycosis are expensive. Previous studies suggest that less costly, pulsed doses of antifungal medications may be as effective as standard, continuous doses. Terbinafine is the current treatment of choice for toenail onychomycosis.

Objective

Our purpose was to determine whether pulse-dose terbinafine is as effective as standard continuous-dose terbinafine for treatment of toenail onychomycosis.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority, clinical intervention trial in the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The main inclusion criteria for participants were a positive dermatophyte culture and at least 25% distal subungual clinical involvement. Six hundred eighteen volunteers were screened; 306 were randomized. Terbinafine, 250 mg daily for 3 months (continuous) or terbinafine, 500 mg daily for 1 week per month for 3 months (pulse) was administered. The primary outcome measure was mycological cure of the target toenail at 18 months. Secondary outcome measures included clinical cure and complete (clinical plus mycological) cure of the target toenail and complete cure of all 10 toenails.

Results

Results of an intent-to-treat analysis did not meet the prespecified criterion for noninferiority but did demonstrate the superiority of continuous-dose terbinafine for: mycological cure of the target toenail (70.9% [105/148] vs 58.7% [84/143]; P =.03, relative risk [RR] of 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.43]); clinical cure of the target toenail (44.6% [66/148] vs 29.3% [42/143]; P =.007, RR=1.52 [95% CI, 1.11-2.07); complete cure of the target toenail (40.5% [60/148] vs 28.0% [40/143]; P =.02, RR=1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.01); and complete cure of all 10 toenails (25.2% [36/143] vs 14.7% [21/143]; P =.03, RR=1.71 [95% CI, 1.05-2.79). Tolerability of the regimens did not differ significantly between the groups (χ2=1.63; P =.65).

Limitations

The study population primarily consisted of older men with severe onychomycosis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the superiority of continuous- over pulse-dose terbinafine. We also found this expensive therapy to be much less effective than previously believed, particularly for achieving complete cure of all 10 toenails.

Le texte complet de cet article est disponible en PDF.

Plan


 The opinions and assertions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Deparment of Veterans Affairs.
Funding sources: Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center and its Health Services Research Center of Excellence on Chronic Disease Outcomes Research. Dr Warshaw's career has been supported by a VA Cooperative Studies Clinical Research Career Development Award.
Disclosure: Dr Warshaw has conducted research trials for several pharmaceutical companies, including Dermik, Paddock, Altana, Coloplast, and Novartis.
Reprints not available from the authors.


© 2005  American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.. Publié par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits réservés.
Ajouter à ma bibliothèque Retirer de ma bibliothèque Imprimer
Export

    Export citations

  • Fichier

  • Contenu

Vol 53 - N° 4

P. 578-584 - octobre 2005 Retour au numéro
Article précédent Article précédent
  • Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States
  • Joel M. Gelfand, Dafna D. Gladman, Philip J. Mease, Nana Smith, David J. Margolis, Tamar Nijsten, Robert S. Stern, Steven R. Feldman, Tara Rolstad
| Article suivant Article suivant
  • Ocular pemphigus
  • Yassine J. Daoud, Rene Cervantes, C. Stephen Foster, A. Razzaque Ahmed

Bienvenue sur EM-consulte, la référence des professionnels de santé.
L’accès au texte intégral de cet article nécessite un abonnement.

Déjà abonné à cette revue ?

Mon compte


Plateformes Elsevier Masson

Déclaration CNIL

EM-CONSULTE.COM est déclaré à la CNIL, déclaration n° 1286925.

En application de la loi nº78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés, vous disposez des droits d'opposition (art.26 de la loi), d'accès (art.34 à 38 de la loi), et de rectification (art.36 de la loi) des données vous concernant. Ainsi, vous pouvez exiger que soient rectifiées, complétées, clarifiées, mises à jour ou effacées les informations vous concernant qui sont inexactes, incomplètes, équivoques, périmées ou dont la collecte ou l'utilisation ou la conservation est interdite.
Les informations personnelles concernant les visiteurs de notre site, y compris leur identité, sont confidentielles.
Le responsable du site s'engage sur l'honneur à respecter les conditions légales de confidentialité applicables en France et à ne pas divulguer ces informations à des tiers.


Tout le contenu de ce site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier, ses concédants de licence et ses contributeurs. Tout les droits sont réservés, y compris ceux relatifs à l'exploration de textes et de données, a la formation en IA et aux technologies similaires. Pour tout contenu en libre accès, les conditions de licence Creative Commons s'appliquent.